1977
DOI: 10.1163/156853977x00063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wolf Spider Sociobiology: I. Agonistic Display and Dominance-Subordinance Relations in Adult Male Schizocosa Crassipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that the absence of density dependence in this treatment is an artifact of continually reintroducing subordinate individuals predisposed to emigrate. Previous studies have indicated that S. ocreata juveniles and adult males exhibit leg-waving displays when encountering a conspecific (Aspey 1975(Aspey , 1976; called S. crassipes by Aspey). Adult male S. ocreata form dominant-subordinate hierarchies (Aspey 1976), though it is unknown whether Schizocosa spiderlings exhibit similar behavior.…”
Section: Effects Of Conspecifics On Emigration Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also possible that the absence of density dependence in this treatment is an artifact of continually reintroducing subordinate individuals predisposed to emigrate. Previous studies have indicated that S. ocreata juveniles and adult males exhibit leg-waving displays when encountering a conspecific (Aspey 1975(Aspey , 1976; called S. crassipes by Aspey). Adult male S. ocreata form dominant-subordinate hierarchies (Aspey 1976), though it is unknown whether Schizocosa spiderlings exhibit similar behavior.…”
Section: Effects Of Conspecifics On Emigration Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have indicated that S. ocreata juveniles and adult males exhibit leg-waving displays when encountering a conspecific (Aspey 1975(Aspey , 1976; called S. crassipes by Aspey). Adult male S. ocreata form dominant-subordinate hierarchies (Aspey 1976), though it is unknown whether Schizocosa spiderlings exhibit similar behavior. Future experiments could clarify whether a constant but random proportion of the spider population emigrated daily, or whether it was a subpopulation of subordinate individuals that reemigrated each day that they were reintroduced.…”
Section: Effects Of Conspecifics On Emigration Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant animals have increased opportunity to access good shelter, food and a mating partner, whereas subordinate animals can be rescued from severe injury or death. Dominance hierarchies are formed in various species of arthropods including crickets (Alexander, 1961), spiders (Aspey, 1977), cockroach (Ewing, 1974), lobsters (Fiedler, 1965), hermit crabs (Hazlett, 1968) and crayfish (Bovbjerg, 1953). Decapod crustaceans, in particular, are good models with which to characterize dominance order both physiologically and behaviourally (Fujimoto et al, 2011;Sato and Nagayama, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominance hierarchies are formed in various species of arthropods including crickets (Alexander, 1961), spiders (Aspey, 1977), cockroaches (Ewing, 1974), lobsters (Fiedler, 1965), hermit crabs (Hazlett, 1968) and crayfish (Bovbjerg, 1953). Some species of vertebrates including mice (Long, 1972;Bronson and Marsden, 1973), golden hamsters (Goldman and Swanson, 1975), rhesus monkeys (Bernstein and Gordon, 1974) and birds (Gottier, 1968) also form dominance hierarchies.…”
Section: Development Of Agonistic Bouts During Growth Of Crayfishmentioning
confidence: 99%