2005
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2005.218.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wolff snowflakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and ω Ω ⊥ H α for some α < d. The R 3 case is due to Wolff [Wol91] and the result for higher dimensions is due to Lewis, Verchota, and Vogel [LVV05]. A corollary of our main results, however, will show that, for NTA domains, mutual absolute continuity can only occur if α ≤ d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…and ω Ω ⊥ H α for some α < d. The R 3 case is due to Wolff [Wol91] and the result for higher dimensions is due to Lewis, Verchota, and Vogel [LVV05]. A corollary of our main results, however, will show that, for NTA domains, mutual absolute continuity can only occur if α ≤ d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In this case we use a result from [8] to conclude that there exist Wolff snowflakes such that the sign of certain integral in the Wolff's program is independent of p when p is in an open interval containing 2. In order to show such a relation, in [8], Lewis, Nyström, and Vogel "perturb" off the p = 2 case from [12,9]. Note that results in [12,9] are valid only when n ≥ 3.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following theorem proves that there are no Wolff snowflakes for which ω + and ω − are mutually absolutely continuous, answering a question in [16]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Here, whenever we refer to a "Wolff snowflake," we will mean a 2-sided NTA domain in R n , for which H − dim ω = n − 1. In [16], Lewis, Verchota and Vogel reexamined Wolff's construction and were able to produce "Wolff snowflakes" in R n , n ≥ 3, for which H − dim ω ± > n − 1, and others for which H − dim ω ± < n − 1. They also observed, as a consequence of the monotonicity formula in [1], that if ω…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation