2001
DOI: 10.1139/z01-094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.

Abstract: The elk or wapiti (Cervus elaphus) and bison (Bison bison) of Yellowstone National Park have lived in an environment free of wolves (Canis lupus) for the last 50 years. In the winter of 1994-1995, wolves were reintroduced into parts of Yellowstone National Park. Foraging theory predicts that elk and bison would respond to this threat by increasing their vigilance levels. We tested this prediction by comparing vigilance levels of elk and bison in areas with wolves with those of elk still in "wolf-free" zones of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
459
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 928 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
22
459
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While some anti-predator behaviour may be heritable (Breden et al 1987;Riechert & Hedrick 1990;Cousyn et al 2001), other behaviour may be much more phenotypically plastic. Indeed, both time allocation (Hunter & Skinner 1998;Laundré et al 2001) and flight initiation distance (Ikuta & Blumstein 2003) may be highly experience-dependent and thus vary for reasons other than variation in the number or types of predators per se. More importantly, the loss of some anti-predator behaviour types does not necessarily result from the loss of all predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some anti-predator behaviour may be heritable (Breden et al 1987;Riechert & Hedrick 1990;Cousyn et al 2001), other behaviour may be much more phenotypically plastic. Indeed, both time allocation (Hunter & Skinner 1998;Laundré et al 2001) and flight initiation distance (Ikuta & Blumstein 2003) may be highly experience-dependent and thus vary for reasons other than variation in the number or types of predators per se. More importantly, the loss of some anti-predator behaviour types does not necessarily result from the loss of all predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a response to perceived predation risk, often heterogeneously distributed across the landscape (52), herbivores may select less risky areas, creating spatial variability in herbivore pressure and thus varying impacts on vegetation (34,53). Therefore, the presence of predators can allow local increases in the abundance of woody species, such as observed after the introduction of wolves in temperate woodlands followed by reduced browsing pressure from deer and locally enhanced recruitment of palatable shrubs and trees (45,(54)(55)(56), resembling that observed in exclosures (Fig. 1E).…”
Section: Spatially Structured Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predation risk is often associated with indirect cues from the environment, including open habitat (Powell and Banks 2004) or moonlight , or for arboreal animals, being on the ground (Mella et al 2014); and with direct cues such as the scats and urine of predators (Apfelbach et al 2005). As these cues vary spatially and temporally (Carthey et al 2011;Hughes et al 2012;Price and Banks 2012), so does the landscape of fear (Laundre et al 2001;van der Merwe and Brown 2008). Animals will forage in safe areas if they can (Banks 2001;Verdolin 2006) but when they must forage in risky areas, they adopt many behaviours to manage their risk, including reduced time allocation, increased vigilance, central place foraging and group foraging (Lima and Dill 1990).…”
Section: Dealing With Predation Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%