2023
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women Authorship Trends in the Highest-Impact Anesthesiology Journals from 2005 to 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a 2013 publication, authorship attribution to females, sex terminology used in source publication, only represent 20% of author attribution in research publications [18]. Bibliometric analysis in specialties inside and outside pathology confirms gender imbalances in publication output and influence [5–7, 9, 11, 12, 17]. This is true despite the increasing number of women physicians entering academic medicine and a slightly higher proportion of women working in academia relative to men in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to a 2013 publication, authorship attribution to females, sex terminology used in source publication, only represent 20% of author attribution in research publications [18]. Bibliometric analysis in specialties inside and outside pathology confirms gender imbalances in publication output and influence [5–7, 9, 11, 12, 17]. This is true despite the increasing number of women physicians entering academic medicine and a slightly higher proportion of women working in academia relative to men in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The gender-based disparities identified in this study are consistent with previous studies in other academic medicine specialties. For example, a study on sex-based authorship trends, sex terminology used in source publication, in the highest-impact anaesthesiology journals over a 16-year period found that female physicians were less likely to be first and senior authors than male, despite increases in female representation in publications [17]. According to a 2013 publication, authorship attribution to females, sex terminology used in source publication, only represent 20% of author attribution in research publications [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Barriers to participation in research for WIA include disproportionate family responsibilities, gender bias, sexual harassment, gender pay gaps, and disproportionate burden of clinical service. 18 In a review of authorship by gender in 5 high-impact journals in anesthesiology including Journal of Clinical Anesthesia , British Journal of Anaesthesia , Anesthesiology , PAIN , and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine , Keim et al 19 showed that since 2005, the number of female authors has slowly increased from 2005 to 2021; however, in 2021 women still only represent 40% of total and first authors and 24% of last authors.…”
Section: The Case For Affinity Groups: Why Do We Need Wicta and Other...mentioning
confidence: 99%