2020
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/graa048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women in economics: a UK perspective

Abstract: The status of women in economics in the US has come increasingly under the spotlight. We exploit high-quality administrative data to paint the first comprehensive picture of the status of women in UK academic economics departments in research-intensive universities. Our evidence indicates that, as in the US, women in economics are under-represented and are paid less than men. The issues facing women in economics in the UK are similar to other disciplines, particularly STEM, but have received less national poli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we observe the upward trend up until 2007 — the intervention year — and a gradual decrease thereafter, which is especially pronounced from 2009 onwards. Over the entire sample period, the raw gender pay gap ranged between around 12 per cent and 9.6 per cent, which are comparable to the gender pay gap literature in the UK (Blackaby et al., 2005; Euwals & Ward, 2005; Gamage et al., 2020; McNabb & Wass, 1997; Mumford & Sechel, 2020; Schulze, 2015), the United States (Ginther, 2001; Ginther & Hayes, 2003; Ginther & Kahn, 2014; Sutanto et al., 2014; Tao, 2018) and Europe (Corsi et al., 2014; Hospido et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we observe the upward trend up until 2007 — the intervention year — and a gradual decrease thereafter, which is especially pronounced from 2009 onwards. Over the entire sample period, the raw gender pay gap ranged between around 12 per cent and 9.6 per cent, which are comparable to the gender pay gap literature in the UK (Blackaby et al., 2005; Euwals & Ward, 2005; Gamage et al., 2020; McNabb & Wass, 1997; Mumford & Sechel, 2020; Schulze, 2015), the United States (Ginther, 2001; Ginther & Hayes, 2003; Ginther & Kahn, 2014; Sutanto et al., 2014; Tao, 2018) and Europe (Corsi et al., 2014; Hospido et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, the pay gap in the higher education sector (10.8 per cent) is higher than the national average for full‐time employees (7.9 per cent) (White, 2021). Findings from representative surveys and administrative records indicate that the gender pay gap in universities is large (Gamage et al., 2020; Mumford & Sechel, 2020) and that progress in addressing the issue is slow. The quest for better and more efficient policies to combat the problem is ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are also more likely to face patronizing or hostile questions during economics seminars, even after controlling for fields, seminar series, and topics , and are more likely to be spoken about online with reference to their physical appearance or personal information (Wu, 2018). In the United Kingdom, the Royal Economics Society has shown that women remain chronically underrepresented at every stage of the economics profession and are paid less than their male counterparts (Bateman et al, 2021;Gamage et al, 2020). Female academic economists are more likely to be employed at lower academic ranks, on a fixed-term basis and in non-traditional posts (such as research-or teaching-only).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments have brought to the surface that systematic discriminating behaviour based on animus may be ubiquitous rather than anecdotal. Gamage et al (2020) provide a telling summary of this new evidence in the economics profession. Processing of image data has revealed that US economics textbooks feature only men (and if there is any woman, it is always the same one-Janet Yellen, the first women president of the Fed).…”
Section: (I) Crossing the Next Research Frontiermentioning
confidence: 97%