2018
DOI: 10.1177/1745499918807031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women in the field: Positioning, troubling, and (em)bodying researcher identities in international and comparative education

Abstract: In this paper, I consider not only issues associated with the positionality of the researcher in international and comparative education fieldwork, but also how the researcher’s gender intercedes and intersects with position. Using heuristic research methods, specifically (self-)dialogue and the collection of research manuscripts, I explored how women researchers describe their experiences conducting international fieldwork and how they position their work as insiders/outsiders. Findings suggest that women str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the tools used within interviews, interviewer characteristics and the approach used can influence power relations in interviews (e.g., Coffey, 1999 ; Johnson, 2018 ; Lomax, 2015 ; Mannay, 2016 ; Rose, 2007 ). The data produced in this study’s telephone interviews elicited rich, long narratives where the women offered personal and sensitive accounts of their experiences ( Phillips, Pell et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the tools used within interviews, interviewer characteristics and the approach used can influence power relations in interviews (e.g., Coffey, 1999 ; Johnson, 2018 ; Lomax, 2015 ; Mannay, 2016 ; Rose, 2007 ). The data produced in this study’s telephone interviews elicited rich, long narratives where the women offered personal and sensitive accounts of their experiences ( Phillips, Pell et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it should be acknowledged that the experiences of women are shaped not just by gender but also by other social categories. Intersecting different identities with gender can open productive spaces for understanding and exploring, and may offer women opportunities to assert various identity features (Johnson, 2018). It is the field setting that determines what key attributes of the researcher are most important and emphasising these advantageous attributes can provide useful ways to build rapport with participants (Mazzei and O'Brien, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also acknowledged across various conversations, including one with a security guard, outside the football venue, who questioned my presence saying I was 'too young to be a veteran' (fieldwork notes), and another with some of the veteran participants who suggested 'I don't look like a typical veteran … due to my age, being a lot younger than they might anticipate, and being female' (fieldwork notes). This presented a tension which I, as a female ethnographer, had to negotiate through additional labour to achieve some degree of insider status, recognising that outsider positions are less desirable and lack credibility (Johnson, 2018). This additional labour occurred through the management of unforeseen events, and using these instances to shift my role in research interactions and thereby minimise my outsider status.…”
Section: Managing Unforeseen Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have utilized this position to bring further nuance and complexity to the discussion of trans-inclusive reproductive health practices by focusing on the history of trans medical struggles broadly and reproductive justice specifically. Positioning trans IOs as leaders in researching their communities harnesses the deep embodiment of the subject matter, which is facilitated by IO status (Johnson, 2018). This embodiment brings together all the positive elements of IO research discussed previously: easier access to communities, deeper rapport, more direct pathways to trust-building, a significant sense of accountability, a more collaborative approach to knowledge building, and ultimately the production of knowledge, which is more likely to aid the community and result in creating useful resources on the subject.…”
Section: The Insider-outsider Research Staircasementioning
confidence: 99%