Women National Leaders

Abstract

The number of women in national elective leadership positions has grown since 1960 when the first woman became prime minister. As the number of women in high elective office has grown, feminist scholars have worked to fill the “gender gap” in the study of national leadership in the disciplines of history, political science, and international relations. Feminist scholars, for instance, have investigated several gender-based assumptions about what the policy priorities of women leaders will be. The first assumption is that a woman leader will promote social programs and expenditures over military defense; this assumption is based on women’s traditional gender role as caretaker. The second assumption is that a woman leader will be likely to eschew the use of military force in foreign policy. The third is that she will introduce or endorse policies that promote gender equality, that is, that she will pursue a feminist agenda. Thus, the general policy questions scholars approach the study of women leaders with are: Is she a socialist? Is she a pacifist? Is she a feminist? Feminist scholars also consider public perceptions about women’s ability to serve as national leader as well as performance, or women’s style of leadership and effectiveness as leaders. Do women lead in a hierarchical, “top-down” command style or do they tend to be more cooperative, collegial, and collaborative than their male counterparts?

Women and Political Leadership in Islam: Ma'nā-cum-Maghzā Critical Hermeneutic Study

“…Similarly, Sheikh Haya Rashed Al Khalifa of Bahrain has made significant contributions as President of the United Nations General Assembly. 44 Conversely, some endeavours faced challenges. For instance, Benazir Bhutto's leadership experienced both triumphs and setbacks in Pakistan, indicating the complexity of navigating a traditionally male-dominated political landscape.…”

Gender and policy response to COVID-19 in Canada and Scotland

“…And if not, why? By gendered expectations, we refer to the notions that women prioritize interactions over agency and decisiveness (Bruckm€ uller and Branscombe 2010; Larsson and Alvinius 2020) and seek to legitimize their political power by feminizing public policy (Bashevkin, 2009;D'Amico 2010). With the conceptual framework of feminist institutionalism, our study investigates the cases of female leadership in Ontario, Canada and Scotland, United Kingdom, and the regional policy response to the pandemic.…”