2002
DOI: 10.1080/13531040212331295892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women of the wall: radical feminism as an opportunity for a new discourse in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first studies on the Women of the Wall were inside analyses by researchers who were among the first founders of this organization, i.e., Haberman (1997, 2012) who also discussed the feminist aspect of the religious realm in the Israeli context and Chidester and Linenthal (1995) who adopted Michel Foucault’s Theory of Power to convey the unavoidable competition or struggle over ownership, legitimacy and sacred symbols in such places. The WOW phenomenon raised the debate about the use of a divider ( mechitsa ) for women’s prayer at the Wall prior to 1948 (Shakdiel, 2002; Charmé, 2005; Shiloh, 2010). Shakdiel (2002), who is also a women’s rights activist but from a different school of thought, rightly portrayed the WOW as an undermining factor in Judaism and in “Israeli Ethnocracy.” Jobani and Perez (2014, 2017) studies pertain to the WOW’s impact on Israeli public discourse concerning the role of religion in Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.…”
Section: Women Of the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first studies on the Women of the Wall were inside analyses by researchers who were among the first founders of this organization, i.e., Haberman (1997, 2012) who also discussed the feminist aspect of the religious realm in the Israeli context and Chidester and Linenthal (1995) who adopted Michel Foucault’s Theory of Power to convey the unavoidable competition or struggle over ownership, legitimacy and sacred symbols in such places. The WOW phenomenon raised the debate about the use of a divider ( mechitsa ) for women’s prayer at the Wall prior to 1948 (Shakdiel, 2002; Charmé, 2005; Shiloh, 2010). Shakdiel (2002), who is also a women’s rights activist but from a different school of thought, rightly portrayed the WOW as an undermining factor in Judaism and in “Israeli Ethnocracy.” Jobani and Perez (2014, 2017) studies pertain to the WOW’s impact on Israeli public discourse concerning the role of religion in Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.…”
Section: Women Of the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WOW phenomenon raised the debate about the use of a divider ( mechitsa ) for women’s prayer at the Wall prior to 1948 (Shakdiel, 2002; Charmé, 2005; Shiloh, 2010). Shakdiel (2002), who is also a women’s rights activist but from a different school of thought, rightly portrayed the WOW as an undermining factor in Judaism and in “Israeli Ethnocracy.” Jobani and Perez (2014, 2017) studies pertain to the WOW’s impact on Israeli public discourse concerning the role of religion in Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. They suggest privatizing the administration of holy places for the different stakeholders and letting the State withdraw from religion.…”
Section: Women Of the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That purity would be compromised by the mixing of the genders in activities there. 54 Of course, the earliest forms of socialist Zionist thinking envisioned a new utopian society shared in equally by Jews regardless of their gender or ethnicity. Indeed, to some degree the Western Wall had already served as a symbol of this ideal.…”
Section: Changes In the Political Meaning Of The Mechitzah After 1967mentioning
confidence: 99%