2016
DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2016.1271536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
42
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Women computer science majors also rate themselves lower than their counterparts in other STEM fields on public‐speaking ability, risk‐taking, and physical health. These distinctions between women and computing and those from other STEM fields are generally consistent with findings from Lehman, Sax, and Zimmerman () using CIRP data from 2015.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Women Planning To Major In Stem: Variatiosupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Women computer science majors also rate themselves lower than their counterparts in other STEM fields on public‐speaking ability, risk‐taking, and physical health. These distinctions between women and computing and those from other STEM fields are generally consistent with findings from Lehman, Sax, and Zimmerman () using CIRP data from 2015.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Women Planning To Major In Stem: Variatiosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, in their foundational study of women in computing at Carnegie Mellon University, Fisher, Margolis, and Miller (1997) found that women in computing were also high achievers but were less academically prepared for computer science specifically than the men in their major, as none of the women in their sample took AP Computer Science courses. More recently, Lehman, Sax, and Zimmerman (2016) also found women in computer science earned lower grades in high school math and science courses than women in other STEM fields. Career Aspirations.…”
Section: Unpacking Stem Via Disciplinary Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, we could not test the relative interaction of the factors due to the limitations prescribed by our Institutional Review Board. We selected the following factors for purposeful interventions in this study: (Beyer, 2014;Croasdell, McLeod, & Simkin, 2011;Joshi & Kuhn, 2011;Lang, 2012;Lehman et al, 2017).  Belief that IS is not creative or useful to society as a whole.…”
Section: Figure 2 Four Factors That Could Affect the Likelihood Of Wmentioning
confidence: 99%