2012
DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2012.706628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women prisoners: an analysis of the process of hospital transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to previous studies which found that transfers to medium secure settings took significantly longer than transfers to PICU and general psychiatric inpatient units (McKenzie & Sales, 2008;Bartlett et al, 2012). Our finding is likely to be limited by an under-representation of prisoners who were transferred to high security hospitals.…”
Section: Logistic Regressioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to previous studies which found that transfers to medium secure settings took significantly longer than transfers to PICU and general psychiatric inpatient units (McKenzie & Sales, 2008;Bartlett et al, 2012). Our finding is likely to be limited by an under-representation of prisoners who were transferred to high security hospitals.…”
Section: Logistic Regressioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Bradley (2009) endorsed a 14 day target as a formal recommendation and the Department of Health has subsequently issued good practice guidance on how this could be achieved (DoH, 2011), see Figure 1. In a more recent evaluation, one study has reported average transfer times from a women's closed prison of 51 days (Bartlett et al 2012). Whilst this is an improvement compared to some of the earlier evaluations, this still far exceeds Bradley's 14 day recommendation and jeopardises the principle of equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations