They are undoubtedly excellent indicators, but they hide big gaps in access and quality of healthcare between private and public health facilities. Further, there are extremely high routine interventions during childbirth, as indicated by a national cesarean section rate of 50% in 2015 (INDH 2016). In the country, there are no out-of-hospital options for birth that are recognized by the health system and thus covered by health insurance. In 2016, 99.7% of births were attended by health professionals in hospitals (DEIS 2018), where the hegemonic model of practice is the technocratic model of childbirth (Davis-Floyd 2001). A study conducted in nine major regional maternity hospitals, with primiparous and multiparous women who were admitted to the labor ward with 2-3 cm of cervical dilatation and whose physiologic labor was a minimum of 4 h, reported the following interventions: 91% had medically induced/augmented labors, 55% had continuous fetal intrapartum monitoring, 56% had episiotomies, and 80% delivered in the lithotomy position (Binfa et al. 2016). These high rates of interventions are harmful and against national and international guidelines (MINSAL 2008; WHO 2018).