Women’s empowerment in rural Honduras and its determinants: insights from coffee communities in Ocotepeque and Copan

Dietz, Thomas; Chong, Andrea Estrella; Gilabert, Paulino Font; Grabs, Janina

doi:10.1080/09614524.2018.1402862

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In our sample, only 63% of women have parity with men in the same household and while this is greater than the results for the previous studies in Honduras, it is very similar to the results from the A-WEAI in Uganda and Bangladesh (Malapit, et al, 2015). The average empowerment gap for these women is 0.26, similar to the results of Dietz, et al (2018) with 0.27. The overall A-WEAI score of 0.76 also closely mirrors the score of Dietz et al (2018) with a score of 0.75 and the FTF sample in western Honduras with a score of 0.75 (Malapit, et al 2014).…”

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 79%

“…The average empowerment gap for these women is 0.26, similar to the results of Dietz, et al (2018) with 0.27. The overall A-WEAI score of 0.76 also closely mirrors the score of Dietz et al (2018) with a score of 0.75 and the FTF sample in western Honduras with a score of 0.75 (Malapit, et al 2014).…”

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 79%

“…The results estimate that 66% of women in the sample are disempowered. This finding is comparable to the 61.2% of women that were disempowered in the Dietz, et al (2018) sample and 68.5% in the Feed the Future sample (Malapit et al, 2014).…”

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 57%

“…The A-WEAI is composed of two subindices: the sub-index of the five domains of empowerment (5DE), which measures the empowerment of women in the five domains of empowerment described above, and the sub-index of gender parity (GPI), which measures the relative empowerment of women to men within the same household. As shown in Table 12, the 5DE score of 0.74 mirrors the results found in Ocotepeque and Copan in Western Honduras (Dietz, et al, 2018) and that of a Feed the Future (FTF) sample of 3,326 households in Western Honduras with a 5DE score of 0.74 (Malapit et al, 2014). The results estimate that 66% of women in the sample are disempowered.…”

Section: A-weaimentioning

confidence: 53%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Gender and food security in Honduras

Allen

Delgado

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI's strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute's work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening, and data and knowledge management are essential components to translate IFPRI's research from action to impact. The Institute's regional and country programs play a critical role in responding to demand for food policy research and in delivering holistic support for country-led development. IFPRI collaborates with partners around the world.

show abstract

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: A-weaisupporting

confidence: 57%

Section: A-weaimentioning

confidence: 53%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Gender and food security in Honduras

Allen

Delgado

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Como se observa en la tabla 12, el puntaje de 5DE de 0.74 refleja los resultados hallados en Ocotepeque y Copán en el occidente de Honduras (Dietz et al, 2018) y los de una muestra de «Alimentar el Futuro» (FTF) de 3326 hogares del occidente de Honduras con un puntaje de 5DE de 0.74 (Malapit et al, 2014).…”

Section: A-weaiunclassified

Género y seguridad alimentaria en Honduras

Allen¹,

Delgado²

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value chains and sustainable development: A perspective of sustainable coffee value chains in East Africa

Canwat

2022

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development concerns have been integrated into global value chainsthrough the enforcement of sustainability standards, making the chains sustainable.Understanding the sustainability effects of sustainable value chains has been limited by the narrow focus on one standard, few larger comparative perspectives, methodological weaknesses, and diversity of contexts. This article analyses how sustainable coffee value chains contribute to sustainable development. Systematically, the study reviewed peer-reviewed publications based on causal methodologies and primary data collected from Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Ethiopia. The paper shows that sustainable value chains promote sustainable development, but their effects vary across sustainability dimensions and standards. Fairtrade has a higher contribution to social sustainability because it emphasizes social issues. Organic standards and the Rainforest Alliance also have a higher contribution to ecological sustainability because they emphasize ecological conservation. Sustainable coffee value chains have more contributions to social and ecological sustainability than economic sustainability because of the trade-offs that ensues from conversion to sustainable value chains. However, combining standards reduces trade-offs. The sustainability effects of sustainable value chains also vary across cooperatives because of their heterogeneity.

show abstract

Women’s empowerment in rural Honduras and its determinants: insights from coffee communities in Ocotepeque and Copan

Cited by 11 publications

References 13 publications

Gender and food security in Honduras

Gender and food security in Honduras

Género y seguridad alimentaria en Honduras

Value chains and sustainable development: A perspective of sustainable coffee value chains in East Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About