2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03447-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s Life Experiences and Shifting Reports of Pregnancy Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future analyses may rely on imputed values based on women's other characteristics to avoid exclusion. In addition, women may adjust their reported preferences for a number of children to match their number of living children, as fertility preferences are often dynamic and may change based on women's experiences after having their children (Chamberlin et al 2022;Trinitapoli and Yeatman 2018;Yeatman, Sennott, and Culpepper 2013). Thus, measures of IFS are not without complication, given the nuances of both the question asked in the DHS and its interpretation, as studies suggest rationalization of ideals to reality (Kebede, Striessnig, and Goujon 2022;Casterline and El-Zeini 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future analyses may rely on imputed values based on women's other characteristics to avoid exclusion. In addition, women may adjust their reported preferences for a number of children to match their number of living children, as fertility preferences are often dynamic and may change based on women's experiences after having their children (Chamberlin et al 2022;Trinitapoli and Yeatman 2018;Yeatman, Sennott, and Culpepper 2013). Thus, measures of IFS are not without complication, given the nuances of both the question asked in the DHS and its interpretation, as studies suggest rationalization of ideals to reality (Kebede, Striessnig, and Goujon 2022;Casterline and El-Zeini 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some number of mothers may not provide a precise numeric response, either because their desires are not finalized, because they want a high number of children but do not have a precise number in mind, or because fertility control may not be a desired option (Hayford and Agadjanian 2011; though Frye and Bachan 2017 show a decline in nonnumeric reports over time). Such responses may also be sensitive to events such as child mortality (Smith‐Greenaway and Sennott 2016) and may shift substantially over time in light of changing circumstances or uncertainty (Chamberlin et al 2022; Trinitapoli and Yeatman 2018; Yeatman, Sennott, and Culpepper 2013; Sennott and Yeatman 2012;). Despite these potential issues with validity, the measure of IFS is widely used to understand mothers’ preferences about their desired number of children and broadly helps to capture how mothers feel about family size.…”
Section: Family Size Preferences In Sub‐saharan Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference could be attributed to population growth policies in Iran in recent years and the fact that this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a cross-sectional study conducted in Iran to compare contraceptive methods, abortion, and unintended pregnancies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was found that the prevalence of unintended pregnancies increased from 20.4% before the pandemic to 25.4% during the pandemic [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, most of the women participating in this study gave the birth beyond one year (61.77%). The information they provided may be biased by recall [ 30 ], but no relationship was observed between FA supplementation and child age [ 31 ]. The estimate may also be biased by the multi-interviewers of 19 although they were well-trained.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%