1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-3319(99)00017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s reproductive rights and social equality in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic modernization of society extends both democratic contestation and democratic inclusion (Doorenspleet 2004;Huntington 1991;Lipset 1960;Przeworski and Limongi 1997;Ramirez, Soysal, and Shanahan 1997), and several researchers have found a relationship between modernization and a change in values supporting women's inclusion in general (Inglehart and Norris 2003b;Steel 1992). At the same time, cross-national studies of abortion rights worldwide (Ramirez and McEneaney 1997) and in developing countries (Pillai and Wang 1999) have not found a relationship between economic development and abortion rights. Some argue that since the liberalization of abortion laws is not affected by the level of economic development or political democracy, there is little support for standard modernization arguments (Pillai and Wang 1999;Ramirez and McEneaney 1997).…”
Section: Economic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The economic modernization of society extends both democratic contestation and democratic inclusion (Doorenspleet 2004;Huntington 1991;Lipset 1960;Przeworski and Limongi 1997;Ramirez, Soysal, and Shanahan 1997), and several researchers have found a relationship between modernization and a change in values supporting women's inclusion in general (Inglehart and Norris 2003b;Steel 1992). At the same time, cross-national studies of abortion rights worldwide (Ramirez and McEneaney 1997) and in developing countries (Pillai and Wang 1999) have not found a relationship between economic development and abortion rights. Some argue that since the liberalization of abortion laws is not affected by the level of economic development or political democracy, there is little support for standard modernization arguments (Pillai and Wang 1999;Ramirez and McEneaney 1997).…”
Section: Economic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the visible presence of a large number of Roman Catholics causes a pro-choice countermobilization among non-Catholics. Indeed, much of the cross-national research has shown that individuals' religious denominations and the strength of religious beliefs have a strong impact on their stance on abortion (Banaszak 1998;Jelen, O'Donnell, and Wilcox 1993;Legge 1983a;Legge 1983b;Pillai and Wang 1999).…”
Section: Cultural Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health in general is socially produced and rights advocates strongly believe that maternal mortality in developing countries may not be reduced without addressing issues of reproductive rights [58][59][60]. Reproductive rights are of two types: rights to make choices with regard to all aspects of reproduction and the right to have access to quality reproductive health care [61][62][63]. However, the number of reproductive choices available is predicated on women's capacity to acquire and utilize information necessary to promote reproductive health [64][65][66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abortion law has attracted attention among scholars, focusing on comparative case studies (Blofield, ; Blofield, ; Yishai, ) and comparative analyses of western industrialized countries (Minkenberg, ; Gindulis, ). During the past 40 years, regular overviews of the development of abortion laws have determined a trend towards liberalization, albeit with some notable exceptions (Cook and Dickens, , ; Rahman et al., ; Cook et al., ; Boland and Katzive, ); in the last two decades, four large‐N quantitative studies analyzed the correlates of this liberalization or of the factors standing in its way (Asal et al., ; Pillai and Wang, , ; Ramirez and McEneaney, ). While Pillai and Wang analyze 101 developing nations, Asal et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%