2013
DOI: 10.1163/22941932-00000026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood Anatomy of Myrciaria, Neomitranthes, Plinia and Siphoneugena Species (Myrteae, Myrtaceae)

Abstract: Myrciaria, Neomitranthes, Plinia and Siphoneugena are closely related genera whose circumscriptions are controversial. The distinctions between Myrciaria vs. Plinia, and Neomitranthes vs. Siphoneugena, have been based on a few fruit characters. The wood anatomy of 24 species of these genera was examined to determine if wood anatomical features could help delimit the genera. It was determined the four genera cannot reliably be separated by wood anatomy alone. Characteristics seen in all four genera are: growth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two reasons. (1) Traditional wood identification relies on diagnostic anatomical features observed by a trained expert, and this technology cannot identify wood samples to the species level because related species often have similar wood structure (Santos et al 2013;Yu et al 2016). (2) Phytochemical analysis (Mcclure et al 2015), near infrared spectroscopy (Pastore et al 2011;Bergo et al 2016), real time time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Cody et al 2012) for wood identification and isotopic analysis (Horacek et al 2009;Kagawa and Leavitt 2010;Krüger et al 2014) to determine provenance are growing but as-yet not widely deployable technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two reasons. (1) Traditional wood identification relies on diagnostic anatomical features observed by a trained expert, and this technology cannot identify wood samples to the species level because related species often have similar wood structure (Santos et al 2013;Yu et al 2016). (2) Phytochemical analysis (Mcclure et al 2015), near infrared spectroscopy (Pastore et al 2011;Bergo et al 2016), real time time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Cody et al 2012) for wood identification and isotopic analysis (Horacek et al 2009;Kagawa and Leavitt 2010;Krüger et al 2014) to determine provenance are growing but as-yet not widely deployable technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until our work there had been no growth studies of Plinia peruviana based on dendrochronological analysis, although growth rings have been described previously in this species (Santos et al, 2013;Stange et al, 2018). Some studies were carried out with species in the same forest typology (Ombrofilous Mixed Forest), showing annual growth rings in Araucaria angustifolia, Cedrela fissilis, Ocotea porosa, and Podocarpus lambertti, due to the climate sazonality that shows warm summers and cold winters (Canetti et al, 2016;Ricken et al, 2022;Stepka et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The wood anatomy with growth rings identification in jaboticaba trees are present in a few researches, demonstrating that the wood features were growth rings compact and poorly-defined, marked by a row of thick-walled fibers radially-flattened (Santos et al, 2013;Stange et al, 2018). However, jaboticaba tree growth patterns studies based on growth rings series have not being carried out, and are important to assist management and species conservation strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower frequency of vessels is found in Apocynaceae (Mainieri & Chimelo, 1989;Miller & Détienne, 2001), Combretaceae (Freitas, 1963;Mainieri & Chimelo, 1989), Erythroxylaceae (Sonsin et al, 2014;L.B. Silva et al, 2017a), Leguminosae (Freitas, 1963;Fedalto et al, 1989;Mainieri & Chimelo, 1989;Miller & Détienne, 2001), Lauraceae (Fedalto et al, 1989;Mainieri & Chimelo, 1989), Moraceae (Freitas, 1963;Carlquist, 1987b;Fedalto et al, 1989;Mainieri & Chimelo, 1989), Myrtaceae (Freitas, 1963;van Wyk et al, 1983;Barros et al, 2001;Marques et al, 2007;Rebollar-Domínguez & Tapia-Torres, 2010;Santos et al, 2013;Sonsin et al, 2014;M.S. Silva et al, 2017b), Rubiaceae (Détienne & Jacquet, 1983;Jansen et al, 2001), among other families.…”
Section: ) Evolution Of Semi-porous and Porous Growth Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%