“…To move away from dependence on, or to complement, human expertise, various authors have advocated for computer vision based approaches to wood and charcoal identification. Several proof-of-concept systems have been reported, relying either on laboratory-acquired images (Khalid et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2013;Filho et al, 2014;Muniz et al, 2016;Barmpoutis et al, 2018;Andrade et al, 2019), or field-acquired cell phone images (Tang et al, 2018) that are relatively variable in terms of chromatic control, total magnification, spherical aberration, and other dataquality factors reviewed in Hermanson and Wiedenhoeft (2011), with two notable forays into controlling these factors for field imaging (Hermanson et al, 2019;Andrade et al, 2020). Computer vision based wood (Ravindran et al, 2018) and charcoal identification is appealing because it is affordable (Ravindran and Wiedenhoeft, 2020) and therefore scalable, operates on an accepted source of variability in wood, its anatomy, and for wood has demonstrated potential for real-world field deployment (Ravindran et al, 2019).…”