2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood-boring beetles associated with Acacia xanthophloea in Nairobi and Machakos Counties, Kenya

Abstract: Naivasha thorn tree, Acacia xanthophloea, is grown for foliage, timber, shade and rehabilitation of soils in areas with high water tables in Kenya. Its production is threatened by insect pests, which cause major losses. Very little is documented on wood-boring beetles which cause considerable economic damage to lumber used in a variety of applications, and little is known about their natural enemies in Kenya. We conducted the study to evaluate the occurrence of wood-boring beetles on A. xanthophloea in two dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, C. sjostedti ‐removal trees produced much larger crowns than C. sjostedti ‐occupied trees but both groups have low starch concentrations, perhaps because trees prioritize resprouting on damaged branches over starch storage (Smith et al, 2018) after stem‐damaging ants are removed. Second, host trees might metabolize starch stores to produce resin to engulf the stem‐boring beetles (as do pines, Gaylord et al, 2007; Ferrenberg et al, 2014, and East African Acacia xanthophloea : Kahuthia‐Gathu et al, 2018) that C. sjostedti facilitates (Palmer et al, 2008), and the costs of repelling beetles may remain high even after the ant has been absent for years. Longitudinal studies of ant–plant stem starch content before and after colonization by C. sjostedti and similar ant partners in other systems (e.g., Edwards et al, 2009) may help us to attribute depressed stem starch to ant partner traits such as stem cavity excavation or parasite facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, C. sjostedti ‐removal trees produced much larger crowns than C. sjostedti ‐occupied trees but both groups have low starch concentrations, perhaps because trees prioritize resprouting on damaged branches over starch storage (Smith et al, 2018) after stem‐damaging ants are removed. Second, host trees might metabolize starch stores to produce resin to engulf the stem‐boring beetles (as do pines, Gaylord et al, 2007; Ferrenberg et al, 2014, and East African Acacia xanthophloea : Kahuthia‐Gathu et al, 2018) that C. sjostedti facilitates (Palmer et al, 2008), and the costs of repelling beetles may remain high even after the ant has been absent for years. Longitudinal studies of ant–plant stem starch content before and after colonization by C. sjostedti and similar ant partners in other systems (e.g., Edwards et al, 2009) may help us to attribute depressed stem starch to ant partner traits such as stem cavity excavation or parasite facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%