2013
DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2011.651785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Woodfuel Harvesting: A Review of Environmental Risks, Criteria and Indicators, and Certification Standards for Environmental Sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum management strategy for these bioenergy plantations needs to be identified through empirical data from field trials for aspects such as harvesting cycle and method, proportion of residue removal, irrigation system, chemical inputs (amount and frequency), and other ancillary human activities such as grazing and logging. Field trials have started in North America and Europe for bioenergy plantations (e.g., SRC) (Bouget et al, 2012;Langeveld et al, 2012;Lattimore et al, 2013), but few have been conducted in Australia. Moreover, management strategies for bioenergy crop production on 'underutilised agricultural land' are not well known, but are expected to require higher resource inputs than productive agricultural land.…”
Section: Key Strategy 3: Identify and Implement Optimum Management Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum management strategy for these bioenergy plantations needs to be identified through empirical data from field trials for aspects such as harvesting cycle and method, proportion of residue removal, irrigation system, chemical inputs (amount and frequency), and other ancillary human activities such as grazing and logging. Field trials have started in North America and Europe for bioenergy plantations (e.g., SRC) (Bouget et al, 2012;Langeveld et al, 2012;Lattimore et al, 2013), but few have been conducted in Australia. Moreover, management strategies for bioenergy crop production on 'underutilised agricultural land' are not well known, but are expected to require higher resource inputs than productive agricultural land.…”
Section: Key Strategy 3: Identify and Implement Optimum Management Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a direct comparison of these products was not the intent of this article, our findings demonstrate pellets' dependence on this assumption by acting as a small-C (case 1) or large-C source (case 2) with or without this assumption. As countries begin claiming the climate reductions of HWPs (UNFCCC 2003), certification of forest practices in MPB stands will be required in meeting a sustainable certification standard (Masters et al 2010), as well as meeting climate mitigation objectives (Lattimore et al 2013). With a potentially diminished growth rate of timber stocks, as seen in the worst-case scenario in Metsaranta et al (2011), C-neutral forestry may in fact not be met at the landscape scale (Holtsmark 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges include the setting of certification standards (Masters et al 2010) and climate mitigation objectives (Lattimore et al 2013) for MPB forests. The challenges in managing harvested wood products include the depth (i.e., material versus product approach) and breadth (i.e., short-versus long-term) of C modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dendromass input (white acacia) represents 1.73% of the whole dendromass in the forests of Slovakia (for year 2010), which represents an area of 33,308.91 hectares. Important feature of dendromass is its moisture (Lattimore et al 2013). When fuel wood is properly dried, its net calorific value is increased (Singh et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%