2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Woody encroachment of grasslands: Near‐surface thermal implications assessed through the lens of an astronomical event

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the thermal landscape, we used iButtons (model DS1925L) as thermal loggers to monitor near-surface temperatures across different vegetation cover types and in different locations across our time-since-fire gradient (Figure S7). iButtons were deployed on days without precipitation to avoid rain interfering with readings, and were not covered by any type of container so that temperature readings could be influenced by solar radiation and wind to a better approximate the operative temperature that an organism would experience (Tanner et al, 2021). We collected 11,031 iButton temperature readings at 15-min intervals during daylight hours from 94 total iButtons including 18 placed in eastern redcedar (2117 readings), 23 in deciduous forest (2536 readings), 29 in grasslands (3376 readings), and 24 in shrublands (3002 readings).…”
Section: Thermal Loggers On the Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the thermal landscape, we used iButtons (model DS1925L) as thermal loggers to monitor near-surface temperatures across different vegetation cover types and in different locations across our time-since-fire gradient (Figure S7). iButtons were deployed on days without precipitation to avoid rain interfering with readings, and were not covered by any type of container so that temperature readings could be influenced by solar radiation and wind to a better approximate the operative temperature that an organism would experience (Tanner et al, 2021). We collected 11,031 iButton temperature readings at 15-min intervals during daylight hours from 94 total iButtons including 18 placed in eastern redcedar (2117 readings), 23 in deciduous forest (2536 readings), 29 in grasslands (3376 readings), and 24 in shrublands (3002 readings).…”
Section: Thermal Loggers On the Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%