2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2023.152221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Woody plant adaptations to multiple abiotic stressors: Where are we?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2023) where they showed that drought‐tolerant species are associated with smaller ranges in European and North American trees and shrubs compared to cold‐ and wet‐adapted species independently from latitude. Indeed, ecological strategy differentiation in resource economics represents a key indicator for abiotic stress tolerance of woody plants of the Northern Hemisphere (Pavanetto et al., 2024; Puglielli, Laanisto, et al., 2023). Furthermore, the relationship observed between specific leaf area and range size (Figure 2) is in line with the findings by Sporbert et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2023) where they showed that drought‐tolerant species are associated with smaller ranges in European and North American trees and shrubs compared to cold‐ and wet‐adapted species independently from latitude. Indeed, ecological strategy differentiation in resource economics represents a key indicator for abiotic stress tolerance of woody plants of the Northern Hemisphere (Pavanetto et al., 2024; Puglielli, Laanisto, et al., 2023). Furthermore, the relationship observed between specific leaf area and range size (Figure 2) is in line with the findings by Sporbert et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because enhanced colonization and competitive ability, driven by higher acquisitive traits, reduce biotic niche constraints on species occurrence, thus promoting species to become widespread early‐successional/generalists (Fristoe et al., 2021; Morin & Chuine, 2006). Besides the effects of biotic niche filtering, recent studies focusing on European and Northern American woody plants have shown that cold‐versus‐drought tolerance positively explains species range size (Puglielli, Laanisto, et al., 2023), and that higher resource‐acquisitiveness (in terms of the leaf economic spectrum, seed mass, and wood density) is associated with cold/waterlogging‐tolerant species compared to drought‐tolerant ones (Martínez‐Vilalta et al., 2023; Pavanetto et al., 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using independent trait dimensions can in fact improve the interpretation of plant strategies (Laughlin, 2014). Including intraspecific trait variability (ITV, including ontogenesis) in this research agenda remains a priority since ITV can alter empirically determined trait trade‐offs (Fajardo et al., 2022; Kuppler et al., 2020; Niinemets, 2015; Puglielli, Cuevas Román, et al., 2017; Puglielli, Laanisto, et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2022) and therefore trait dimensions, ultimately modifying trait–tolerance relationships. However, the current shortage of large‐scale ITV data (Chelli et al., 2019; Kattge et al., 2020) hinders filling this gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trait‐based approach has been dominating the understanding of species' resistance to abiotic stressors (e.g., Hallik et al., 2009; Puglielli, Laanisto, et al., 2021, 2023; Sack, 2004; Stahl et al., 2013), defined here as a species' ability to tolerate adverse abiotic conditions in its natural environment (ecological tolerance, sensu Niinemets & Valladares, 2006, 2008). Most previous research has followed the hypothesis that adaptations to tolerate a given stress prevent species from simultaneously enduring other stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These alterations are represented by an abiotic stress gradient (Rosli et al, 2018). Abiotic stress gradient is understood as the factors that exert fundamental restrictions on the distribution, form, and function of sessile soil organisms (Puglielli et al, 2023). It also consists of all those foreign elements of the soil system or the existence of an unusual level that generates a harmful effect on soil organisms and their consumers (Egea et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%