Wool and cloth production in late medieval and earlyTudorEngland

Abstract

Estimates of wool production based on the exports of wool and cloth, and an assumption that domestic cloth consumption was, optimistically, constant, suggest that wool production fell by almost a third from the early fourteenth to the mid‐fifteenth century, and had not fully recovered even by the mid‐sixteenth century. However, after the Black Death, much of England's arable was converted to pasture, mainly for sheep, and this process accelerated after 1470. These two observations are contradictory. This article provides new numbers of adult sheep based on estimates of domestic cloth consumption, cloth exports, the changing weight of cloth, and fleece yields. The conclusion is that the adult sheep population only declined by around 13 per cent from 1310 to 1440, and had risen dramatically by the mid‐sixteenth century.

Becoming Through Milling: Challenging Linear Economic Narratives in Medieval England

“…Supported and driven by population expansion, vibrant and expansive export markets for English grain, wool and mineral resources developed (e.g. Childs 1981; Hybel 2002; Kowaleski 1995, 16–18; Oldland 2014). Agricultural producers adopted increasingly specialized husbandry regimes and mills were erected by landowners and entrepreneurs (e.g.…”

Historical geography of the pastoral system in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia

“…Thus, swampy areas were also used apart from the existing pastures for grazing (Mate 1987). The number of sheep decreased during the Black Plague pandemic in the mid-fourteenth century, and by the 16th century, its sharp increase was again observed (Oldland 2014). The importance of sheep farming was very high, and in international trade, this sector expanded its area significantly in the Middle Ages.…”

The Clothiers’ Century, 1450–1550

“…In the fifteenth century, quality woollens production moved decisively from towns to the countryside, and increased dramatically as both export and home demand increased. 1 Bruce Campbell has suggested that 'non-agricultural employment may have contributed roughly a tenth of rural incomes by 1300. Two centuries later this proportion had probably doubled, as manufacturing fastened more vigorously onto rural labour.'…”