2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Error Analysis in Aphasia: Introducing the Greek Aphasia Error Corpus (GRAEC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech fluency was measured by the speech rate (SR) in two tasks (a) the Stroke Story (SS) test, which requires the patient to describe orally her/his stroke incident, and (b) the Cookie Theft Picture (CTP) test, which requires the description of a picture depicting a “cookie theft” event. SR was calculated as the total number of words divided by the total duration of speech (words/minute), as previously implemented in studies investigating narrative abilities in patients with aphasia (see for example: Andreetta et al, 2012 ; Efthymiopoulou et al, 2017 ; DeDe and Salis, 2020 ; Gordon and Clough, 2020 ; Kasselimis et al, 2020 ) and patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA; see for example: Knibb et al, 2009 ; Wilson et al, 2010 ). Patients were instructed to speak with no restrictions with respect to narration time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Speech fluency was measured by the speech rate (SR) in two tasks (a) the Stroke Story (SS) test, which requires the patient to describe orally her/his stroke incident, and (b) the Cookie Theft Picture (CTP) test, which requires the description of a picture depicting a “cookie theft” event. SR was calculated as the total number of words divided by the total duration of speech (words/minute), as previously implemented in studies investigating narrative abilities in patients with aphasia (see for example: Andreetta et al, 2012 ; Efthymiopoulou et al, 2017 ; DeDe and Salis, 2020 ; Gordon and Clough, 2020 ; Kasselimis et al, 2020 ) and patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA; see for example: Knibb et al, 2009 ; Wilson et al, 2010 ). Patients were instructed to speak with no restrictions with respect to narration time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of long silent intervals, the examiners provided the patients with minimal encouragement to continue the narration. In case the patients did not respond, narration assessment was stopped (for a detailed description, see Angelopoulou et al, 2020 ; Kasselimis et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recorded speech samples have to undergo orthographic transcription, adhering to the fundamental conventions of discourse analysis transcription (for Greek, see [50]). Additionally, the coding conventions from the Greek Aphasia Error Corpus, as detailed by Kasselimis et al [51], have to be applied during transcription. Instruction by examiners and extraneous discussion between examiners and participants that are irrelevant to the narration content should be identified and subsequently omitted.…”
Section: Suggested Methodological Pipeline For the Connected Speech A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silent pauses were annotated following the pipeline presented in Angelopoulou et al (3), using ELAN program (Brugman and Russell, 2004;Wittenburg et al, 2006). Speech samples were orthographically transcribed following the basic conventions of the coding conventions of the Greek Aphasia Error Corpus [see (32)]. Silent pauses' frequency was calculated for each participant, for each narrative task, adjusted for total number of words utterned.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%