2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Representations For Gender Classification Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSTM: we only use the LSTM model to the QA and use the one-hot representation [46] to assign each word a unique id. This is the baseline of our experiment.…”
Section: E Experimental Results Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSTM: we only use the LSTM model to the QA and use the one-hot representation [46] to assign each word a unique id. This is the baseline of our experiment.…”
Section: E Experimental Results Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this accounts for temporal label changes and locale-adaptation, the method remains context-unaware. As an alternative to lookup-based approaches, neural networks trained on gender-labeled names have also been explored (Bhagvati & Bhagvati, 2018;Septiandri, 2017;Wood-Doughty et al, 2018). However, such methods do not incorporate context-sensitivity in any form.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the different distributions of names across the genders (Bhagvati & Bhagvati, 2018;Blevins & Mullen, 2015;Santamaría & Mihaljevic, 2018) to label names as feminine, masculine, or "neutral" is the most popular approach. 2 These methods rely on a large database of names along with their corresponding gender labels to perform name-gender inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%