1981
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2403.358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word-Retrieval Difficulty and Disfluent Speech in Adult Anomic Speakers

Abstract: The relationships existing between measures of disfluency and measures of word-retrieval ability in adult anomic aphasic and adult non-brain-damaged subjects were investigated. Subjects produced single-word naming responses for pictured stimuli consisting of objects, colors, and actions. The obtained number of correct naming responses and word-retrieval latency measurements were related to the number and types of disfluencies present in the subjects' connected speech samples. The major findings of the investig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPIDR-3 is an automated measure of propositional idea density, which provides an indicator of speech fluency and lexical diversity (Kemper & Sumner, 2001). As word-retrieval difficulties in aphasia can result in overt breakdown in word retrieval as well as reduced lexical diversity (e.g., Fergadiotis & Wright 2011) and disfluencies (e.g., Brown & Cullinan, 1981), we would predict that group treatment with a focus on word retrieval would result in improved POWERS indices and higher propositional idea density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPIDR-3 is an automated measure of propositional idea density, which provides an indicator of speech fluency and lexical diversity (Kemper & Sumner, 2001). As word-retrieval difficulties in aphasia can result in overt breakdown in word retrieval as well as reduced lexical diversity (e.g., Fergadiotis & Wright 2011) and disfluencies (e.g., Brown & Cullinan, 1981), we would predict that group treatment with a focus on word retrieval would result in improved POWERS indices and higher propositional idea density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%