2019 12th International Conference on Information &Amp; Communication Technology and System (ICTS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icts.2019.8850957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) for Indonesian Homograph Word Meaning Determination by LESK Algorithm Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To decipher the confusing term, the LESK algorithm has been utilized. The result set of the proposed system is in line with the result set of KBBI as well as provides an accuracy of 78.6% for one of the ambiguous words while 62.5 % for two ambiguous words as explained in [15]. The effort of identifying the meaning of a word in a certain situation is known as word sense disambiguation (WSD).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To decipher the confusing term, the LESK algorithm has been utilized. The result set of the proposed system is in line with the result set of KBBI as well as provides an accuracy of 78.6% for one of the ambiguous words while 62.5 % for two ambiguous words as explained in [15]. The effort of identifying the meaning of a word in a certain situation is known as word sense disambiguation (WSD).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Table I shows the results of a comparative investigation of existing systems with the proposed system. 1) The LESK procedure has been used to disambiguate Indonesian Homograph Word referred in [15]. 2) This system provides 78.6% accuracy if one ambiguous word present, and 62.5% accuracy if two ambiguous words present.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patil, et al [16]'s algorithm was evaluated on 6 Marathi polysemous words with a total 14 senses and achieved an overall accuracy of 80%. Arabic [40] and Indonesian [15] achieved almost the same accuracy with 0.1 difference, 78% and 79%. The Arabic WSD was tested on 50 polysemous words with 20 context sentences per word.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sense with the highest score in the combination is allocated as the most suitable sense within that context. In another study [15] used the LESK algorithm for Indonesian and achieved an accuracy of 78.6% for one Indonesian ambiguous word and 62.5% for two ambiguous words.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%