2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word-to-text integration: Message level and lexical level influences in ERPs

Abstract: Although the reading of connected text proceeds in a largely incremental fashion, the relative degree to which message level and lexical level factors contribute to integration processes across sentences remains an open question. We examined the influence of both factors on single words using event-related potentials (ERPs). Word pairs with either strong or weak forward association strength were critical items: embedded as coreferential words within two-sentence passages in a text comprehension task, and as is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, several reading experiments that used subjective semantic relatedness measures found effects on the N400 (Camblin et al, 2007;Metusalem et al, 2012;Stafura & Perfetti, 2014;Van Petten, 1993). Other studies applied distributional semantics to quantify semantic relatedness in experimental stimuli.…”
Section: Models Of Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, several reading experiments that used subjective semantic relatedness measures found effects on the N400 (Camblin et al, 2007;Metusalem et al, 2012;Stafura & Perfetti, 2014;Van Petten, 1993). Other studies applied distributional semantics to quantify semantic relatedness in experimental stimuli.…”
Section: Models Of Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Predictability is relatively low in cross-sentence boundary reading. For example, Stafura and Perfetti (2014) manipulated association strength between the final word of the first sentence and first word of a second sentence. Though they included a strong association condition and a control condition, overall cloze probabilities were low (strong association: M =…”
Section: Integrative Processes In Text Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, memory measures, as the savings in re-learning and the false recognition tasks, should be less affected, or maybe not affected at all, by this contamination. Unfortunately, although there are models which can be used to make predictions about the processes underlying lexical and text level effects (Kintsch, 1988; see also Sharkey & Sharkey, 1992), we still don't understand how lexical activation emerging from single words interacts with a more elaborate and holistic processing of the text (Stafura & Perfetti, 2014). Thus, knowing to what degree this confounder influences performance in different STI tasks remains an empirical question which needs to be carefully addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%