2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt04091f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Words in supramolecular chemistry: the ineffable advances of polyiodide chemistry

Abstract: Foundations of the discording vocabulary of novel supramolecular interactions lay onto polyiodide chemistry. Reviewing advancements in the field, we tackle I⋯I contacts understanding, rationalization, and language on semantic and scientific grounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inset shows (left to right) covalent bond distribution for I 3 – (violet) and interaction distances of I 3 – subunits with generic I 2 probes, either covalent (i.e., pentaiodide proximal bond distances, red) or supramolecular (pink), in order to give an appropriate view of actual broadness of statistical distributions. Reproduced with permission from ref ( 36 ). Copyright 2021 Royal Society of Chemistry.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inset shows (left to right) covalent bond distribution for I 3 – (violet) and interaction distances of I 3 – subunits with generic I 2 probes, either covalent (i.e., pentaiodide proximal bond distances, red) or supramolecular (pink), in order to give an appropriate view of actual broadness of statistical distributions. Reproduced with permission from ref ( 36 ). Copyright 2021 Royal Society of Chemistry.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both types of chains, the I 3 − anions were asymmetric, with the shorter and longer I–I bond distances being 2.91 and 2.96 Å, respectively, in one chain, and 2.92 and 2.95 Å in another. Despite the slight difference, the average I–I bonding distance fell within the range of 2.92–2.95 Å, typical for I 3 - anions [ 15 , 18 ]. Both I 3 − anions exhibited slight deviations from linearity, the I–I–I angle being 177 deg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structure of 2 comprised three building units: the I - and I 3 - anions and the DMPDA dications ( Figure 1 ). The triiodide anion was considerably asymmetric, and the I–I distances were 2.86 and 3.00 Å, which corresponds to the average I–I distance of 2.93 Å, typical for triiodide anions irrespective of their actual symmetry [ 15 , 18 ]. The I 3 − anion was linked to the DMPDA cation through a sole (N)H⋅⋅⋅I interaction of 2.79 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Naturally, any such interaction does not necessarily operate in isolation of other intermolecular forces and may very well cooperate with other obvious supramolecular synthons such as those formed by conventional hydrogen-bonding [5]. With the continuing surge of interest in identifying any number of intermolecular contacts in crystals [6][7][8][9][10], secondary-bonding interactions, including halogen-bonding [11], occupy a prominent position, so much so that a new lexicology has emerged [12][13][14]. Thus, the terms triel- [15], tetrel- [16], pnictogen- [17] and chalcogen-bonding [18] refer to the group the electrophilic element is derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%