2016
DOI: 10.17795/jhealthscope-42014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Ability Score (WAS) as a Suitable Instrument to Assess Work Ability Among Iranian Workers

Abstract: Background: The high item numbers is one of the Work Ability Index (WAI) limitations that make it difficult to be completed by the workers. Using the single-item Work Ability Score (WAS) as a simple is one of the proposed solutions which is valid and suitable measure for work ability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also established a strong correlation between the dimension of current work ability and the entire WAI. This correlation was also reported by studies on much larger samples investigating if current work ability could replace the WAI questionnaire (26,(41)(42)(43). In contrast, some researchers have come to the conclusion that current work ability is an insufficient measure in itself, as it poorly identifies the risk of disability retirement, and have therefore recommended that researchers should stick to the complete WAI instrument.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also established a strong correlation between the dimension of current work ability and the entire WAI. This correlation was also reported by studies on much larger samples investigating if current work ability could replace the WAI questionnaire (26,(41)(42)(43). In contrast, some researchers have come to the conclusion that current work ability is an insufficient measure in itself, as it poorly identifies the risk of disability retirement, and have therefore recommended that researchers should stick to the complete WAI instrument.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A variety of studies have looked into associations between WAI and sick leave, disease (14-16), lifestyle (14,(17)(18), physical activity/exercise (19)(20), quality of life (3,(21)(22), age (23)(24)(25)(26), education (27), work-related stress (27)(28)(29)(30)(31), musculoskeletal disorders (32)(33)(34)(35), work-family conflicts (35), changing employer or leaving the profession (36)(37)(38), night and shift work (22,39), fatigue (40), current work ability (41)(42)(43), menopause (44), migration (45), ethnicity (46), physical work capacity (47), psychosocial hazard (48), successful aging strategies (26,(49)(50)(51), individual factors (4, 52-54), work-related factors, working conditions and workload (4,14,52,54), work injury (52), and job ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, work abilities were also measured with two single items. Since the WAI is very long, several studies have compared it with just a single measure, which seems to work well as a proxy for the whole scale (Ahlstrom et al, 2010;Jaaskelainen et al, 2016;Mokarami et al, 2017). It should be noted that this may not be the case if work ability is measured to predict long-term sick leave/disability pension (Roelen et al, 2014;Schouten et al, 2016), which however, was not the focus of this study.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the effect of age, sex, education, employment status, occupation, marital status, socioeconomic status, weight and body mass index (BMI) has been investigated using both the WAS and WAI,1 4 10–12 few studies have investigated the impact of physical performance factors on work ability using the WAS. Age-related decline in work ability is a multifactorial process estimated to occur from middle adulthood, with the physical decline of multiple body systems and the consequent sarcopenia-related loss of muscle strength contributing to a decreased ability to perform physical tasks that often constitute work 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%