2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work environment and well-being of different occupational groups in hospitality: Job Demand–Control–Support model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this survey, two professionals who performed managerial functions fell ill in a situation of low wear, results similar to those of a survey with health managers, in which a great concentration of these professionals was observed in these same work situations (44) .…”
Section: Professionals In Active Working Conditions and Highsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this survey, two professionals who performed managerial functions fell ill in a situation of low wear, results similar to those of a survey with health managers, in which a great concentration of these professionals was observed in these same work situations (44) .…”
Section: Professionals In Active Working Conditions and Highsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As already observed in another research (43) , both care and administrative sectors can be classified as passive work. The prevalence of mental health service's care workers in the passive work scenario can be explained by the fact that most of them are nursing auxiliaries and technicians, not performing managerial functions, which supposedly offer greater control over the work process (44) .…”
Section: Professionals In Active Working Conditions and Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, unemployed respondents were hit the hardest with 76.1% having a score higher than 26. Well-being was operationalized as low and high categories following Ariza-Montes, Arjona-Fuentes, Han, and Law (2018) . Nearly 80% of the respondents reported poor well-being in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervisors' support in low-skilled occupations tends to be a major predictor of employees' well-being (Ariza-Montes, Arjona-Fuentes, Han, & Law, 2018;Winkler, Busch, Clasen, & Vowinkel, 2015). Nevertheless, SAS is distinct from supervisors' support, as SAS specifically enhances employees' sense of autonomy through autonomy-supportive behaviours, therefore giving a more precise indicator of the type of supervision which contributes to the well-being of employees in low-skilled occupations.…”
Section: Psychological Autonomy a Basic Need As Proposed By Self-detmentioning
confidence: 99%