1984
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90199-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function, electron affinity and band bending of zinc oxide surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

35
109
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
35
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been reported in several previous reports of FE from ZnO and in some cases leads to nonlinear FN plots, [29][30][31] the interpretation of which is quite uncertain as a result. This hysteresis effect is generally attributed to the effect of adsorbates, and disappears following adequate conditioning of the samples.…”
Section: B Fe Apparatus and Measurementssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This effect has been reported in several previous reports of FE from ZnO and in some cases leads to nonlinear FN plots, [29][30][31] the interpretation of which is quite uncertain as a result. This hysteresis effect is generally attributed to the effect of adsorbates, and disappears following adequate conditioning of the samples.…”
Section: B Fe Apparatus and Measurementssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…10,11 The for ZnO and an ionization energy of CuPc were determined to be 4.0 and 4.9 eV, which are consistent with previously reported values within the error margin of our measurements. 9,12 The band alignment between air exposed ZnO and CuPc in Fig. 4͑a͒ is indicative of a typical staggered junction with a positive 0.2 eV for eD due to charge redistribution.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The of sputter cleaned ZnO ͑3.4 eV͒ is in good agreement with previous results for a Zn terminated ZnO surface ͑0001͒ because oxygen on the surface is preferentially removed by sputtering during the cleaning process. 9 The valence band maximum ͑VBM͒ of ZnO and the HOMO onset position appear at 3.0 eV and 0.7 eV from the Fermi level, respectively. During the subsequent deposition of CuPc on the sputtered ZnO surface, the HOMO onset position is shifted to lower binding energy by 0.3 eV.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical properties of non-polar ZnO surfaces were investigated theoretically [4][5][6][7] and experimentally by low energy electron diffraction (LEED), [8][9][10] scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and/or spectroscopy (STS), [11][12][13] and other surface sensitive techniques. [14][15][16][17] It is generally accepted that non-polar ð11 20Þ and ð10 10Þ ZnO surfaces exhibit a 1 Â 1 surface unit cell, where the surface oxygen atom relaxes slightly outward, while the surface zinc atom becomes more sp 2 hybridized. This relaxation is combined with a charge transfer from Zn to O, but the resulting electronic properties are strongly debated: Some calculations predict that the intrinsic surface states are outside of the fundamental bulk bandgap, 4,5 while a newer calculation suggests intrinsic surface states within the fundamental bandgap, at least for the ð10 10Þ surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work function measurements are inconclusive too, as some suggest a flat band situation 14 and thus the absence of intrinsic surface states in the fundamental bandgap, whereas others suggest a band bending at the ð10 10Þ surface. 16 Angular-resolved photoemission 18 and electron energy loss spectroscopy experiments 17 find no surface states within the fundamental bandgap. Over all, the electronic properties of non-polar ZnO surfaces are unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%