2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function for the deformed metal surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be noted that the change in work function due to strain is slightly different for Mo and W (110) surfaces, i.e. in the strain range of −0.05-0.05, the work function change is 0.4 to −0.22 eV for Mo, while it is 0.31 to −0.21 eV for W. It should be pointed out that the general trends of the strain effect on work function from first-principles calculations are in good agreement with those from experimental studies as well as semi-empirical models found in the literature [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Strain Effect On Work Functionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It can also be noted that the change in work function due to strain is slightly different for Mo and W (110) surfaces, i.e. in the strain range of −0.05-0.05, the work function change is 0.4 to −0.22 eV for Mo, while it is 0.31 to −0.21 eV for W. It should be pointed out that the general trends of the strain effect on work function from first-principles calculations are in good agreement with those from experimental studies as well as semi-empirical models found in the literature [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Strain Effect On Work Functionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…19 A number of previous works have shown an effect of load on electrochemical potential. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] A clear difference was observed between the effect of elastic and plastic loads on the EWF. For elastic loads it was considered that the stress mainly influences the potential drop across the metal/vacuum interface due to the changing in the distance between surface atoms, while the change of the chemical potential in the metal bulk is negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…22,24 For plastic loads, the stress above the yield point creates plastic deformation with the generation of dislocations. 20,21,[24][25][26][27] The changing of EWF after elastic and plastic strains has also been analyzed for stainless steel. 23,26 For the duplex grade AISI S31803 it was observed that during strain ferrite had a lower potential than austenite and that elastic deformation increased EWF by 0.020-0.025 eV whereas plastic deformation decreased the EWF 0.3 eV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These defects are connected with charge redistribution to the defected material surface. Non-uniform charge distribution on the surface can be appeared as if the on-site Coulomb interaction and repulsive interaction of charges occupying adjacent sites are taken into account [12,13]. In the presence of nanoscale defects, the Coulomb interaction of localized charges starts to play a more significant role and strongly modify the local electronic density of states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%