2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function mediated interface charge kinetics for boosting photocatalytic water sterilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluorescence lifetime of O–CN (41.32 ns) and IDT-COOH (26.11 ns) is longer than that of 40% IDT-COOH/O–CN (14.12 ns), which indicates that more carriers could participate in the subsequent photocatalytic reaction via the effect of the IEF in heterojunction (Figure d) . The above results show that IEF and strong electron delocalization effect could promote the separation of e – –h + pairs and increase the migration efficiency of photogenerated carriers …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The fluorescence lifetime of O–CN (41.32 ns) and IDT-COOH (26.11 ns) is longer than that of 40% IDT-COOH/O–CN (14.12 ns), which indicates that more carriers could participate in the subsequent photocatalytic reaction via the effect of the IEF in heterojunction (Figure d) . The above results show that IEF and strong electron delocalization effect could promote the separation of e – –h + pairs and increase the migration efficiency of photogenerated carriers …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The binding energy shifts can demonstrate the existence of significant charge transfer between MXene and CN. , Moreover, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) was used to probe the Fermi energy levels of the components and to determine the type of heterojunction by the difference in the work function. The secondary electron cutoff energies ( E cutoff ) for CN, MXene, and MCN 2:1 were 16.85, 16.17, and 16.55 eV, respectively, and their work functions ( E WF ) were 4.37, 5.05, and 4.67 eV, respectively, on the basis of the equation E WF = E He I (21.22 eV) – E cutoff (Figure d) . In Figure e, when CN and MXene were in close contact, the electrons of CN can spontaneously flow to the interface of MXene until their Fermi energy levels reach equilibrium (4.67 eV) due to the significant E WF difference between CN and MXene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The TEM images of the 2D/2D MCN heterojunction (Figure 1e 2d). 42 In Figure 2e, when CN and MXene were in close contact, the electrons of CN can spontaneously flow to the interface of MXene until their Fermi energy levels reach equilibrium (4.67 eV) due to the significant E WF difference between CN and MXene. Note that the band gap, conduction band, and valence band energy levels marked in Figure 2e are analyzed in Figure S10.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs in the photocatalytic reaction and the hysteresis kinetics of the catalyst surface reaction limit the activity of the photocatalyst. Generally, the work function (Φ) determines the band alignment and charge transfer direction of the heterostructure, [ 70 ] while the work function of MXene is determined by its metal component and surface group. The work function of MXene is adjustable, resulting in different components of MXene may have metal‐like properties or semiconductor properties.…”
Section: Cocatalyst For Photoinduced E−/h+mentioning
confidence: 99%