1977
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90257-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function of stepped tungsten single crystal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besocke and Wagner found a decrease in ' proportional to the step density on Au(111) [2] and used this to estimate the average value of the step dipole. Similar results have been reported for Pt(111) and W(110) [3,4]. Calculations using the jellium model [5] predict that the localized step dipole increases with step height and screening length.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Besocke and Wagner found a decrease in ' proportional to the step density on Au(111) [2] and used this to estimate the average value of the step dipole. Similar results have been reported for Pt(111) and W(110) [3,4]. Calculations using the jellium model [5] predict that the localized step dipole increases with step height and screening length.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is suggested that the surface dipole moment potential depends on the density of the surface atoms, while the work function value increases as the surface atomic density increases [58]. In fact, it is reported that the work function decreases as a function of surface step density [59], which can be explained by the Smoluchowski effect [60,61]. Indeed, the minimum work function observed on Si nanoparticles can also be explained by this same effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Particularly the planes with high work functions are difficult to deal with. An extrapolation of the experimentally determined work functions of Yang and Hudson [12] (see table 2) results in a work function for the (110) plane of #I = 5.11 eV, which is lower by 0.15 eV than found in the very careful work of Krahl-Urban et al [7]. For the comparison of the experimentally determined and the calculated work functions (see …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%