Work, health and the commodification of life's time: reframing work–life balance and the promise of a long life

Abstract

How to respond to an ageing society has become an increasingly important question, for employers, workers and policy makers. Here we critically engage with that debate, arguing that future approaches to the relationship between work and age should take into account multiple influences on older worker behaviour, including the combination of economic, lifecourse and personal priorities. We consider the international consensus that has emerged about the primacy of work as the solution to what to do with a long life. We then address the uncertain nature of work as it affects older workers, and discuss the commodification of time in relation to a productivist approach to demographic ageing and the attitudes of older workers themselves. A tension is noted between pressures for continuity and discontinuity within the adult lifecourse which is often eclipsed within a policy discourse that tends to focus on continuity as a route to social legitimacy. Thinking about life-time as a meta-narrative, a tension between existential life priorities and commodification, may help to explain the ease with which ‘live longer–work longer’ policies both dominate and obscure the potential of a long life. Finally, we examine the implications for work–life balance and suggest this needs to be radically re-thought when addressing the purpose of a longer working life and the promise of a long life in general.

Creating a common world through action: what participation in community activities means to older people

“…This strategy, however, fails to account for the multi-dimensionality of the human condition depicted by Arendt's typology. As Biggs et al (2017) argue, overly productivist adaptations to longer life can result in the ‘commodification of life's time’, diminishing people's potential to realise alternative priorities that increased longevity can offer.…”

“I choose to go without everything really”: Moral imperatives, economic choice and ageing

“…Because people are responsible for their choices, the solution to inequalities becomes encouraging people to make suitable choices in life, thereby shifting responsibility for outcomes in later life from the collective and/or the state to the individual (Biggs et al . ).…”

Recommodification and the Welfare State in Re/Financialised Austerity Capitalism: Further Eroding Social Citizenship?

“…This includes, for example, ways in which people are increasingly compelled, via various restrictions on social housing, to access and bear the risk of housing as a commodity (Scanlon et al, 2015). Nor does it account for the 'commodification of life's time' (Biggs et al, 2017) in how the retirement age has been revised upwards in several countries. The normal retirement age is due to increase by 3.3 years on average in eighteen out of thirty-five OECD countries by 2060, out of which twelve are in the EU Fiona Dukelow (OECD, 2017).…”