2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work-life conflict and musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study of an unexplored association

Abstract: BackgroundThe health consequences of work-family or rather work-life conflict (WLC) have been studied by numerous researchers. The work-related causes of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are also well explored. And stress (at work) has been found to be a consequence of WLC as well as a cause of MSD. But very little is known about a potential association between WLC and MSD and the possible mediating role of stress in this relationship.MethodsSurvey data collected in 2007 among the workforces of four large compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
1
16

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
60
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirming Hypothesis 1, WPC was positively related to MSP. This result is in line with studies showing that physical and psychosocial work characteristics are likely to enhance MSP (McBeth & Jones, 2007), and it confirms previous findings (Hämmig et al, 2011) showing that Swiss employees with high WPC had the highest risk for pain in the back, shoulder and neck. The relations between WPC and MSP in the current study were moderate or even high -which is surprising because many other risk factors are also known to be involved (Elfering & Mannion, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confirming Hypothesis 1, WPC was positively related to MSP. This result is in line with studies showing that physical and psychosocial work characteristics are likely to enhance MSP (McBeth & Jones, 2007), and it confirms previous findings (Hämmig et al, 2011) showing that Swiss employees with high WPC had the highest risk for pain in the back, shoulder and neck. The relations between WPC and MSP in the current study were moderate or even high -which is surprising because many other risk factors are also known to be involved (Elfering & Mannion, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…In sum, the current conceptual model is based on an integration of two previously conceptualised and confirmed models: (1) the basic model of Hämmig, Knecht, Läubli, and Bauer (2011) who suggested stress mediates the effects of WPC on MSP (solid lines in Figure 1), and (2) the conceptual model postulating sleep complaints mediate the effects of work stressors on health (dashed lines in Figure 1, e.g. Elfering, Pereira, Grebner, & Müller, 2015;Yang & Park, 2015).…”
Section: The Current Mediation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two studies, Hammig and colleagues investigated the association between work-family conflict and musculoskeletal pain [Hammig and Bauer 2009, Hammig, et al 2011]. They found an association between high work-family conflict and self-reported neck/shoulder pain and back pain among workers across four different industries including the healthcare sector [Hammig, et al 2011]. However, this study did not adjust for working conditions such as night shift work and number of work hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although multiple predictors are tested in the literature in order to link them to the different stages of disability and RTW status [14,120,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128], little information is provided on the characteristics of interventions likely to prevent the development of prolonged disability or RTW in ''good health'' [129]. There appears to be a growing consensus that psychological (distress, depression, readiness to change) and ergonomic workplace factors (work support, work satisfaction) are predictors of RTW outcomes and play an important role in early psychosocial intervention [98,130,131]. Some recent predictive RTW models include mainly psychological work-related and ergonomic factors that appear to have a protective effect and promote participants' RTW [132,133].…”
Section: Risk Factors and Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%