1975
DOI: 10.2307/2576471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Response to Income Maintenance: Economic, Sociological, and Cultural Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Disentangling the effects of social causation and social selection ideally requires an experimental design that manipulates poverty levels and studies the effects on mental illness. 11 Income ex-periments, such as this, have occasionally been done; for example, the New Jersey Negative Income Tax experiment of the 1960s, 12,13 and its replications. [14][15][16] However, none of these studies investigated the effects of relief from poverty on mental health.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Disentangling the effects of social causation and social selection ideally requires an experimental design that manipulates poverty levels and studies the effects on mental illness. 11 Income ex-periments, such as this, have occasionally been done; for example, the New Jersey Negative Income Tax experiment of the 1960s, 12,13 and its replications. [14][15][16] However, none of these studies investigated the effects of relief from poverty on mental health.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work attitudes were tested further with a six-item forced choice response scale developed by Tausky.30 Items were gauged in terms of three work alternatives. These consisted of: ( 1) work or non-work dimensions; (2) social versus economic rewards; and (3) job prestige in preference to low level occupational and financial security.…”
Section: (B) Income Maintenance and The Meaning And Commitment To Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key rationale in these works is that of the 'culture of poverty'. 3 This approach assumes that the values of the poor differ from those shared by other members of society. It is suggested, for example, that among the hard-core and welfare poor there is a group supported rejection of work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paramount concern among social policymakers is the moral hazard behavior a social policy might foster. One of the most discussed aspects of the concern has been whether and to what extent unconditional income support creates disincentives to work (Standing, ; Wright, ). A long‐held view is that welfare benefits that do not specify any work‐related obligation discourage labor market participation and promote laziness and dependency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%