2013
DOI: 10.3233/wor-121520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work-site health promotion of frequent computer users: Comparing selected interventions

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Frequent computer use is associated with an increase in musculoskeletal complaints. The present study aims at comparing the relative efficacy of three novel interventions for the preventions of musculoskeletal complaints in frequent computer users. PARTICIPANTS: 93 employees (56 woman, 37 men, mean age 40.1 ± 8.8 years) with frequent computer use. METHODS: Participants were assigned on the basis of preference to one of the following interventions of 8 week duration: Nordic Walking (NW), biofeedback … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure that all effect sizes are computed on independent groups, in cases where studies assessed the effect of different micro-break interventions against the same control group, we combined those intervention groups into one by using standardized or pooled data [17,49,59,75,[77][78][79][80]. For the study conducted by Rees et al [81] several steps were taken, namely: (1) for each of the five post-interruption blocks for each outcome variable tested (i.e., correct responses, reaction times, response bias, sensitivity), the average was calculated; (2) from every five experimental groups (i.e., free break, music, music with video, choosing between listening to music or watching a music video, no activity break), because they were tested against the same control group, we created a single intervention group by calculating their weighted mean and pooled standard deviation; and (3) because three outcome measures fell into our accuracy operationalization of performance, we aggregated them into a single accuracy indicator.…”
Section: Summary Measures and Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure that all effect sizes are computed on independent groups, in cases where studies assessed the effect of different micro-break interventions against the same control group, we combined those intervention groups into one by using standardized or pooled data [17,49,59,75,[77][78][79][80]. For the study conducted by Rees et al [81] several steps were taken, namely: (1) for each of the five post-interruption blocks for each outcome variable tested (i.e., correct responses, reaction times, response bias, sensitivity), the average was calculated; (2) from every five experimental groups (i.e., free break, music, music with video, choosing between listening to music or watching a music video, no activity break), because they were tested against the same control group, we created a single intervention group by calculating their weighted mean and pooled standard deviation; and (3) because three outcome measures fell into our accuracy operationalization of performance, we aggregated them into a single accuracy indicator.…”
Section: Summary Measures and Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because only two studies collected and analyzed follow-up data [ 75 , 76 ], we decided to include only the post-manipulation data in our analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the others a pre-post intervention[25,26]. Relaxation is an often-utilised secondary employee intervention designed to improve how individuals cope with workplace stressors[12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%