Work stress and resident burnout, before and during the COVID-19 pandemia: An up-date

Navinés, Ricard; Olivé, Victòria; Fonseca, Francina; Martín‐Santos, Rocío

doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2021.04.005

Cited by 26 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies, such as that by Gálvez Muñoz and Rodrígez Modroño (2011) [ 30 ], concluded that women are the most disadvantaged with regard to labor during economic crises, and these authors reported historical guidelines to guarantee equality. In addition, the results obtained in this study indicate that the general employment situation of women is more precarious because they are employed in sectors where the crisis has had a greater presence and a greater impact, such as health, education, and the service sector, due to the decrease in demand and to the implementation of restrictions [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Difference between Impacts of COVID-19 on Women and Men’s Psychological, Social, Vulnerable Work Situations, and Economic Well-Being

Iglesias-Martínez

Roces-García

Arberas

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The SARS-CoV-2 virus changed social reality worldwide, affecting people’s health and work life, particularly their anxiety levels. The purpose of this study is to verify the situation of women in terms of anxiety and social determinants in Spain during the pandemic. The sample consisted of 4686 people (3500 women and 1186 men). The tools used were the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and an ad hoc questionnaire to assess the work and mental situation of the participants. The results indicate a higher rate of anxiety among women than among men and reveal a relationship between higher levels of anxiety and more vulnerable work situations in terms of higher unemployment rates, contract changes, etc. Furthermore, there was a higher percentage of women than men in the sectors where the health crisis has had a greater impact and presence, with repercussions on the physical, mental, and social health of the entire population and especially on women. It is necessary to take into account the social determinants of health, not only at the structural level, in terms of the socio-economic and political contexts, to avoid and limit the axes of inequality such as gender.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Difference between Impacts of COVID-19 on Women and Men’s Psychological, Social, Vulnerable Work Situations, and Economic Well-Being

Iglesias-Martínez

Roces-García

Arberas

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The National Institute for Health Care Management reported that, from 2019 to 2020, the frequency of anxiety symptoms tripled and depression symptoms nearly quadrupled. 28 Compared with 2019, in late June 2020, the proportion of 18-to 24-year-old respondents reporting at least 1 adverse mental or behavioral health symptom increased from 6.5% to 24.3%. 29 In addition, more than one-half of employees in all sectors experienced emotional problems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…23 The pandemic worsened burnout in most specialties. 28 The challenges of maintaining emotional well-being in this pandemic are not unique to healthcare. The National Institute for Health Care Management reported that, from 2019 to 2020, the frequency of anxiety symptoms tripled and depression symptoms nearly quadrupled.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One-Year Follow-Up of COVID-19 Impact on Surgical Education: Clinical Training Restored but Surgical Trainee Emotional Well-Being Still at Risk

Ellison

Spanknebel

Farmer

et al. 2022

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: A previous survey documented the severe disruption of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on surgical education and trainee well-being during the initial surge and systemic lockdowns. Herein, we report the results of a follow-up survey inclusive of the 2020 to 2021 academic year. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was distributed to education leaders across all surgical specialties in summer 2021. We compared the proportion of participants reporting severe disruption in key areas with those of the spring 2020 survey. Aggregated differences by year were assessed using chi-square analysis. RESULTS:Disclosure Information: Dr Ellison receives royalty payment from McGraw-Hill and Wolters-Kluwer.

show abstract

“…En cuanto a estudios de síntesis de la evidencia que realizaran análisis cualitativos, se identificó un metanálisis de Batra et al, de 2020, donde se encontró una prevalencia de AP del 37,4 %, el cual incluyó en un grupo de personal de enfermería se encontró una prevalencia del 25 % (31), como se muestra en la tabla 1. Adicionalmente, otro gran número de estudios en países de alto ingreso de Norteamérica, Europa y Asia han informado prevalencias de AP desde el 8 % en intensivistas de Países Bajos hasta el 60 % en enfermeras de primera línea en China (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49).…”

Section: Prevalencia Del Agotamiento Psicológico En El Personal De Sa...unclassified

Síndrome de agotamiento psicológico en personal de la salud durante la pandemia por COVID-19: revisión narrativa

Alarcón-Moreno

Rodríguez-Pugliesse

Sánchez-Neira

2022

Revista Investig. Salud Univ. Boyacá

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: La pandemia por COVID-19 ha representado una alta carga laboral y emocional en los trabajadores de salud, lo cual se ha asociado con consecuencias negativas para la salud de estas personas, como el agotamiento psicológico (AP). Objetivo: Identificar en la producción de la literatura la prevalencia del síndrome de AP y sus factores asociados en el personal de salud en la pandemia por COVID-19. Metodología: Se llevó a cabo una revisión narrativa de la literatura en bases de datos electrónicas como Medline, Science Direct y LILACS para tres ejes temáticos: 1) AP en personal de la salud, 2) prevalencia del AP durante la pandemia por COVID-19 y 3) los factores asociados durante los años 2019 al 2021. Resultados: Diversos estudios evaluaron el AP en personal de salud durante la pandemia por COVID-19, con prevalencias desde el 8 % hasta el 68 %. Adicionalmente, los factores que se asociaron con una mayor prevalencia fueron tener mayor carga laboral, pocas horas de sueño, menor edad y trabajar en cuidados intensivos. Conclusiones: El personal de salud presentó prevalencias muy variadas del síndrome de AP en la pandemia por COVID-19, asociados a condiciones laborales y de formación clínica, que fueron los más representativos.

show abstract

Work stress and resident burnout, before and during the COVID-19 pandemia: An up-date

Cited by 26 publications

References 31 publications

Difference between Impacts of COVID-19 on Women and Men’s Psychological, Social, Vulnerable Work Situations, and Economic Well-Being

Difference between Impacts of COVID-19 on Women and Men’s Psychological, Social, Vulnerable Work Situations, and Economic Well-Being

One-Year Follow-Up of COVID-19 Impact on Surgical Education: Clinical Training Restored but Surgical Trainee Emotional Well-Being Still at Risk

Síndrome de agotamiento psicológico en personal de la salud durante la pandemia por COVID-19: revisión narrativa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About