2022
DOI: 10.1177/10690727221099803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Volition Scale for Chinese Working Adults: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study

Abstract: The present study aims to validate the Chinese version of the Work Volition Scales (WVS), an instrument that assesses three components of work volition: volition, financial constraint, and construct constraint. In Study 1 ( N = 498), the WVS was translated into Chinese, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted resulting in that three factors were consistent with the original scale. In Study 2 ( N = 442), the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the bifactor model provided the most parsimoniou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They then discussed and resolved any differences to achieve a consensus for the Chinese version. Next, the Chinese translation of FSCB scale was back-translated to English by two skilled translators independently (Lan et al, 2022). Importantly, to ensure reliability and validity, two experts in human resource management checked both the original scale and the back-translated version, comparing the meaning of the items based on Chinese cultural characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then discussed and resolved any differences to achieve a consensus for the Chinese version. Next, the Chinese translation of FSCB scale was back-translated to English by two skilled translators independently (Lan et al, 2022). Importantly, to ensure reliability and validity, two experts in human resource management checked both the original scale and the back-translated version, comparing the meaning of the items based on Chinese cultural characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%