Workarounds Emerging From Electronic Health Record System Usage: Consequences for Patient Safety, Effectiveness of Care, and Efficiency of Care

Abstract

BackgroundHealth care providers resort to informal temporary practices known as workarounds for handling exceptions to normal workflow unintendedly imposed by electronic health record systems (EHRs). Although workarounds may seem favorable at first sight, they are generally suboptimal and may jeopardize patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care.ObjectiveResearch into the scope and impact of EHR workarounds on patient care processes is scarce. This paper provides insight into the effects of EHR workarounds on organizational workflows and outcomes of care services by identifying EHR workarounds and determining their rationales, scope, and impact on health care providers’ workflows, patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. Knowing the rationale of a workaround provides valuable clues about the source of origin of each workaround and how each workaround could most effectively be resolved. Knowing the scope and impact a workaround has on EHR-related safety, effectiveness, and efficiency provides insight into how to address related concerns.MethodsDirect observations and follow-up semistructured interviews with 31 physicians, 13 nurses, and 3 clerks and qualitative bottom-up coding techniques was used to identify, analyze, and classify EHR workarounds. The research was conducted within 3 specialties and settings at a large university hospital. Rationales were associated with work system components (persons, technology and tools, tasks, organization, and physical environment) of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to reveal their source of origin as well as to determine the scope and the impact of each EHR workaround from a structure-process-outcome perspective.ResultsA total of 15 rationales for EHR workarounds were identified of which 5 were associated with persons, 4 with technology and tools, 4 with the organization, and 2 with the tasks. Three of these 15 rationales for EHR workarounds have not been identified in prior research: data migration policy, enforced data entry, and task interference.ConclusionsEHR workaround rationales associated with different SEIPS work system components demand a different approach to be resolved. Persons-related workarounds may most effectively be resolved through personal training, organization-related workarounds through reviewing organizational policy and regulations, tasks-related workarounds through process redesign, and technology- and tools-related workarounds through EHR redesign efforts. Furthermore, insights gained from knowing a workaround’s degree of influence as well as impact on patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care can inform design and redesign of EHRs to further align EHR design with work contexts, subsequently leading to better organization and (safe) provision of care. In doing so, a research team in collaboration with all stakeholders could use the SEIPS framework to reflect on the current and potential future configurations of the work system to prevent unfavorabl...

Factors associated with workarounds in barcode‐assisted medication administration in hospitals

“…A lack of coherence between the wishes and expectations of healthcare providers, patients and technological capabilities could be the cause of this. Suggested is that, to avoid this, healthcare workers such as nurses, pharmacists and medical doctors should already be involved in the implementation phase of new IT‐based systems (Blijleven, Koelemeijer, Wetzels, & Jaspers, 2017; Koppel, Smith, Blythe, & Kothari, 2015; van der Veen, de Gier, van der Schaaf, Taxis, & van den Bemt, 2013). In our previous study in four hospitals in the Netherlands, we showed that workarounds are associated with medication administration errors (van der Veen, van den Bemt, Wouters, et al, 2017).…”

Technology barriers and strategies in coordinating care for chronically ill patients

“…work-arounds (Blijleven, Koelemeijer, Wetzels, & Jaspers, 2017; Halbesleben, Wakefield, & Wakefield, 2008; Koppel, Wetterneck, Telles, & Karsh, 2008; Patterson, 2018). …”

Understanding the EMR-Related Experiences of Pregnant Japanese Women to Redesign Antenatal Care EMR Systems

“…Previous studies have shown that healthcare providers do not want EMR systems to disrupt their existing workflows and want them to integrate well into their work practices [15][16][17]. They want to easily navigate and find information in the EMRs [18][19][20] and need the EMR systems to support all of their formal [21,22] and informal documentation and communication tasks [23]. The shortcomings of previous EMR systems could be attributed to the task-focused mindset of early system implementers.…”