Worker training for new threats: A proposed framework

Abstract

Given the possibility for the introduction of CBRNE threats into the workplace, all workers need some training in the potential hazards involved: the individual worker's specific role in an emergency; incident command; activation of the emergency notification system; use of personal protective equipment (PPE); and safe evacuation of the workplace. While some occupational sectors have developed effective training related to these new threats, there is a need to develop, implement, and evaluate training programs across many different sectors of the workforce.

Manipulation of Safety Training Practices on Organizational Safety Performance: An Evidence in Malaysia’s Automotive Industry

“…However, [23] claimed that some employees reported they were not given even the basic training because their management viewed safety at workplace as unimportant. As highlighted in [31], the assessment is less commonly measured and the evidence is often anecdotal and doubtful methodology.…”

“…Therefore, both management and employees have their own part to play in maintaining a safer workplace. In this case the key personnel turn out to be individuals in organizations that hold the important responsibility of providing more comprehensive safety training besides ensuring that employees are prepared to practice training content [23]. Employees that are involved should be given the credit because they have shown and created greater safety awareness which has a significant result on the organizations cost saving [24].…”

Worker productivity and outpatient service use after the September 11th attacks: Results from the New York City Terrorism Outcome Study

“…In this study, both the short-term (1 year after) and long-term impacts (2 years after) of these exposures are assessed. If terrorist attacks in urban civilian areas become more commonplace [Boscarino et al, 2003a,b], then understanding the impact of these events and developing interventions for working populations will be of strategic importance [Mitchell et al, 2004].…”

Assessment of Surface Transportation Security Training Needs and Delivery Preferences

“…However, identification of training needs for any type of worker who could encounter dangerous chemical, biological, or radiological weapons or bombs was the subject of a 2002 conference sponsored by CDC and National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and held at Johns Hopkins University. In a summary article, Mitchell et al (2004) identify five key needs as training in the potential hazards involved: the individual worker's specific role in an emergency, incident command, activation of the emergency notification system, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and safe evacuation of the workplace.…”

“…Outside of the federal government, experts and stakeholders also have noted the need for more effective transportation security to deal with the terrorism threats the United States faces in the early 21st century (AASHTO 2002;Fries et al 2008;Helmick and Compton 2004;Johnston 2004;Meyer 2008;Mitchell et al 2004). Because potential threats are present in train and bus stations, ports, platforms and waiting areas, and on surface and maritime vehicles, all surface transportation workers need some training in the recognition and assessment of potential hazards and dangerous activities, as well as response and notification protocols in the event of an incident or evacuation.…”