2006
DOI: 10.15209/jbsge.v1i1.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workers’ Affective Commitment and their Willingness to Perform Discretionary Work Behaviour: the Impact of Commitment-Oriented Human Resources Management Practices

Abstract: This paper contributes to the development of the human resource management (HRM) literature through developing the linkages between HRM practices and employee attitudes and behaviours. It is widely believed that the implementation of high commitment human resource management (HRM) practices (e.g., training and development, communication, and participative decision making) can create strategic advantage for the organisation (e.g., Arthur, 1994; Delaney and Huselid, 1996). It is also suggested that HRM practices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with an earlier study conducted by Siu [41] , who also found a positive relationship between the physical well-being of employees and affective commitment. According to Zeidan [44] , employees with high affective commitment demonstrate emotional attachment/identification with, and involvement in the organization, and such employees are less likely to engage in withdrawal behaviors such as absenteeism, low performance, and turnover [45] , [46] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with an earlier study conducted by Siu [41] , who also found a positive relationship between the physical well-being of employees and affective commitment. According to Zeidan [44] , employees with high affective commitment demonstrate emotional attachment/identification with, and involvement in the organization, and such employees are less likely to engage in withdrawal behaviors such as absenteeism, low performance, and turnover [45] , [46] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a social-exchange perspective, safety helping can be a way to reciprocate high positive relationships with the organizations and supervisors who show they care for their employees (Curcuruto & Griffin, 2018;Hofmann et al, 2003;Mearns & Reader, 2008;Zohar, 2002). In the broader literature on work performance (Zeidan, 2006) and organizational citizenship (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000), affective commitment has been shown to predict forms of citizenship considered prosocial or affiliation-oriented, like altruism and supportive behaviours (Belschak & Den Hartog, 2010;Carmeli & Colakoglu, 2005;Curcuruto & Griffin, 2018;Shore & Wayne, 1993;Vogus, Rothman, Sutcliffe, & Weick, 2014). We thus also hypothesize:…”
Section: Proactivity Toward Workplace Safety Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of work intention has been repetitively examined in studies in which the employee' s intent to stay with an organization has correlated with behaviors such as performance and turnover (e.g., Griffeth, Hom, & Gaertner, 2000;Hom et al, 1984;Podsakoff et al, 2007;Steel & Ovalle, 1984;Tett & Meyer, 1993;Zeidan, 2006). The intent to leave an organization has been shown to be the strongest predictor of employee turnover behavior in contrast to the lack of job satisfaction or the lack of organizational commitment (Tett & Meyer).…”
Section: Work Intention Actions Are Guided By Mentally Represented Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel & Ovalle, 1984;Tett & Meyer, 1993); (2) intent to endorse (e.g., Moorman & Blakely, 1995;Porter et al, 1974); (3) intent to exert discretionary effort (e.g., Gould-Williams, 2003;Zeidan, 2006); (4) intent to use organizational citizenship behaviors (e.g., Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Moorman, & Fetter, 1990); and (5) intent to perform (e.g., Williams & Anderson, 1991). These types of intentions should be assessed to fully understand behavioral intentions that may emanate from an individual' s positive sense of work well-being.…”
Section: Implications For Hrd Practicementioning
confidence: 99%