Workers' health and productivity under occupational heat strain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Occupational heat strain (ie, the effect of environmental heat stress on the body) directly threatens workers' ability to live healthy and productive lives. We estimated the effects of occupational heat strain on workers' health and productivity outcomes. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines for this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and Embase from database inception to Feb 5, 2018, for relevant studies in any labour environment and at any level of occupational heat strain. No restrictions on language, workers' health status, or study design were applied. Occupational heat strain was defined using international health and safety guidelines and standards. We excluded studies that calculated effects using simulations or statistical models instead of actual measurements, and any grey literature. Risk of bias, data extraction, and sensitivity analysis were performed by two independent investigators. Six random-effects meta-analyses estimated the prevalence of occupational heat strain, kidney disease or acute kidney injury, productivity loss, core temperature, change in urine specific gravity, and odds of occupational heat strain occurring during or at the end of a work shift in heat stress conditions. The review protocol is available on PROSPERO, registration number CRD42017083271. Findings Of 958 reports identified through our systematic search, 111 studies done in 30 countries, including 447 million workers from more than 40 different occupations, were eligible for analysis. Our meta-analyses showed that individuals working a single work shift under heat stress (defined as wet-bulb globe temperature beyond 22•0 or 24•8°C depending on work intensity) were 4•01 times (95% CI 2•45-6•58; nine studies with 11 582 workers) more likely to experience occupational heat strain than an individual working in thermoneutral conditions, while their core temperature was increased by 0•7°C (0•4-1•0; 17 studies with 1090 workers) and their urine specific gravity was increased by 14•5% (0•0031, 0•0014-0•0048; 14 studies with 691 workers). During or at the end of a work shift under heat stress, 35% (31-39; 33 studies with 13 088 workers) of workers experienced occupational heat strain, while 30% (21-39; 11 studies with 8076 workers) reported productivity losses. Finally, 15% (11-19; ten studies with 21 721 workers) of individuals who typically or frequently worked under heat stress (minimum of 6 h per day, 5 days per week, for 2 months of the year) experienced kidney disease or acute kidney injury. Overall, this analysis include a variety of populations, exposures, and occupations to comply with a wider adoption of evidence synthesis, but resulted in large heterogeneity in our meta-analyses. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation analysis revealed moderate confidence for most results and very low confidence in two cases (average core temperature and change in urine specific gravity) due to studies being funded by industry. Interpretation Occupational heat strain has importan...

Acute kidney injury and workload in a sample of California agricultural workers

“…Piece‐rate work increases the likelihood that a worker will experience heat‐related illness and even death, and while piece‐rate work was not associated with heat strain in our work, nor was heat strain associated with AKI, other studies document the association of heat strain and AKI. A meta‐analysis by Flouris et al found that 15% of workers who experience heat stress also experience AKI or kidney disease. Workers paid by the piece tend to be unauthorized immigrants with lower levels of education and English‐language skills .…”

The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate

“…Labour productivity loss estimates for every degree increase of WBGT beyond 24°C range from 0.8% to 5%. 38 Reduced labour productivity is often the first symptom of the health effects of heat, and, if not addressed, may lead to more severe health effects, such as heat exhaustion and heat stroke.…”

Escalating environmental summer heat exposure—a future threat for the European workforce

“…We quantify the productivity losses (reduction in available work time) that would occur if the international standard recommendations are enforced (ISO 1989, see 'Wet bulb globe temperature and derived indices'). If working people do not reduce their work as much, the losses would be less but at the expense of other effects on workers' well-being (Flouris et al 2018). These ISO recommendations apply to acclimatized workers; thus, they might be more appropriate for Southern European cities.…”

“…Also, future heat waves are very likely to be more frequent and longer-lasting (IPCC 2013), mainly as a direct consequence of the increase in mean temperatures (Schär, et al 2004;Fischer and Schär 2010). Those changes relate to increasing environmental heat exposure throughout the twenty-first century (Willett and Sherwood 2010;Zhao et al 2015;Knutson and Ploshay 2016;Coffel et al 2018;Li et al 2018;Matthews 2018) which in turn might have an effect on mortality, well-being and labour productivity (Dunne et al 2013;Kjellstrom et al 2018;Mora et al 2017;Flouris et al 2018;Levi et al 2018;Moda et al 2019). The combination of environmental heat exposure and internal heat production generated from metabolic processes results in heat stress (Xiang et al 2014).…”