We are a mother and daughter, both health care professionals, who offer a follow-up to an article we published twenty years ago about the impact of each other's ongoing, serious medical problems on our relationship. In this article, we contribute a long-term perspective on the differences between having an illness that is well or poorly understood by medical professionals and the lay community. We also discuss health in the context of identity formation and life stage, as during this interval the daughter left home, graduated college, married, and had two children. Also in this period, the mother survived a third breast cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. We discuss the impact of these experiences on each other and in other important relationships in our lives. Current discourses on daughters of breast cancer survivors do not fit our experience and we speculate about why our story differs. We find that although we continue to contend with serious medical issues that impact our own, each other's, and our families' lives, nonetheless, our lives are rich, rewarding, and "appropriate" for our life stage. That is the news. No longer listening for sounds from her bedroom, wondering if she has fainted or collapsed, I am still, nonetheless, tethered to her unreliable body. I can only hope that her tether to me is thinner than mine is to her; but I know that hers to her 3-year-old daughter is like mine was to her.Twenty years ago, in 1995, my daughter, Miranda Worthen, and I sat down to write a talk for a Medical School Conference, subsequently published (Weingarten & Worthen, 1997), about the impact on each of us of the other's medical condition. At that point, I had been diagnosed and treated for breast cancer twice. Miranda was born with a rare genetic disorder that can affect-and had-many organ systems. The conceptual frame of the original article provided an analysis of the "impact of having a condition that is either poorly or well understood" (Weingarten & Worthen, 1997; p. 41). We constructed our article around the narrative categories of narrative coherence, narrative closure, and narrative interdependence (Chatman, 1978). However, these terms were shortly to prove inadequate to the task of describing, much less accounting for, our embodied experiences. A subsequent article (Weingarten, 2000), drawing on several narrative schemas, was more successful.Each of us has had considerable feedback over the years about how helpful the original article was to readers. Comments affirmed our hope that our writing would be considered in the light of the long tradition of people using personal story to illuminate shared experience, such as Murray Bowen (1978). In 2011, we decided to write a follow-up article, but our efforts were undermined by medical events in both of our lives. Medical problems frequently disrupt both of our lives and the lives of our networks of support; it is part of the story we wish to document here. Medical crises require focused thought, planning, and action. Stepping back and analyzing one'...