Working conditions in primary care: a qualitative interview study with physicians in Sweden informed by the Effort-Reward-Imbalance model

Abstract

Background Many problems with primary care physicians’ psychosocial working conditions have been documented. Many studies on working condition have used the Effort-Reward-Imbalance (ERI) model, which posits that poor health and well-being may result from imbalances between the level of effort employees perceive that they put into their work and the rewards they receive. The model has not been used in qualitative research or applied to investigate primary care physicians’ working conditions. The aim of this study was to apply the ERI model to explore the perceived efforts and rewards by primary care physicians in Sweden and approaches they take to cope with potential imbalances between these efforts and rewards. Methods The study has a qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to achieve a heterogeneous sample of primary care physicians who represented a broad spectrum of experiences and perceptions. We recruited 21 physicians; 15 were employed in public health care and 6 by private health care companies. Results The analysis of the interviews yielded 11 sub-categories: 6 were mapped to the efforts category, 3 were attributed to the rewards category and 2 were approaches to coping with effort/reward imbalances. Many of the statements concerned efforts in the form of high workload, restricted autonomy and administrative work burden. They also perceived resource restrictions, unpredictability of work and high expectations in their role as physicians as efforts. Three types of rewards emerged; the physicians found their job to be stimulating and meaningful, and the work climate to be supportive. The physicians coped with imbalances by means of job enrichment and using decisional latitude. Conclusions Primary care physicians perceive numerous types of efforts in their job, which is consistent with research concerning work stress and associated consequences, such as poor subjective health and well-being. There are also rewards according to primary care physicians, but the findings suggest a lack of reciprocity in terms of efforts and rewards although firm conclusions cannot be drawn since the study did not investigate the magnitude of the various efforts and rewards or the effectiveness of the approaches the physicians use to cope with imbalances. The ERI model was found to be useful to explore physicians’ primary care work and working conditions but its applicability likely depends on the type of work or professions being studied.

How health care professionals handle limited resources in primary care – an interview study

“…Furthermore, this also highlights that prioritising in primary care is highly contextual and situated. Our findings also complement previous studies on the importance of organisational culture [ 33 , 34 ] by adding that a work- culture which promotes a healthy work-life balance is required for primary care professionals to create actions that do not compromise their own well-being.…”

“Keep It Short and Simple”: Perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of a mobile health app in the care for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

“…(b) healthcare providers are not optimally informed about the specific problems of each individual patient; and (c) patients receive fragmented care due to a lack of collaboration between different healthcare providers and/or healthcare organisations. 4,[27][28][29][30] All stakeholders in our study were convinced that an mHealth application can constitute a solution for these challenges. (a) By offering a visual overview of the individual's progression of a patient's functional and biochemical outcomes, the treating healthcare provider as well as the patient himself would gain more insight into his disease activity.…”

“…Several challenges have been identified in the follow‐up of PC survivors: (a) Patients do not know not how to interpret their functional outcomes and how they compare with other PC patients; (b) healthcare providers are not optimally informed about the specific problems of each individual patient; and (c) patients receive fragmented care due to a lack of collaboration between different healthcare providers and/or healthcare organisations 4,27–30 . All stakeholders in our study were convinced that an mHealth application can constitute a solution for these challenges.…”

Pattern and perception of wellbeing, quality of work life and quality of care of health professionals in Southwest Nigeria

“…Nigeria like most African countries is facing health care service challenges such as inadequate budget allocation to health care services and human resources. While remedy to these inadequacies are not in sight, effort may be directed at balancing effort and reward of health professionals in Nigeria to motivate them in providing quality care as lack of reciprocity in terms of efforts and rewards impacts quality of care [ 51 ]. As noted earlier, poor wellbeing and quality of work life are contributing factors hampering quality care.…”