1996
DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing

Abstract: This article is a literature review which seeks to answer four questions: 1) What is washback? 2) How does washback work? 3) How can we promote positive washback? 4) How can we investigate washback? Building on the 'Washback Hypothesis' proposed by Alderson and Wall, and suggestions from Hughes, the article proposes a model that identifies participants, processes and products which may influence, or be influenced by, washback. Strategies for investigating wash back are also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
258
0
41

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
258
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…FIGURE 1. The Basic Model of Washback by Bailey (1996) Volume 14(3), (http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403 ISSN: 1675-8021 Bachman and Palmer (1996) took a different approach for investigating the impact of washback at the micro and macro levels. They used the same categorization as Bailey"s but investigated the test impact at the micro level, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE 1. The Basic Model of Washback by Bailey (1996) Volume 14(3), (http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403 ISSN: 1675-8021 Bachman and Palmer (1996) took a different approach for investigating the impact of washback at the micro and macro levels. They used the same categorization as Bailey"s but investigated the test impact at the micro level, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, whether a test creates positive or negative washback is determined initially by the overlap of test items with the Target Language Use (TLU) domain (Green 2007;Messick 1996). However, washback is manifested through the interaction between the test and the various participants, processes and products (Bailey 1996;Hughes 2003), and thus researchers must provide evidence of washback in contexts in which the tests are actually being used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para explicar o mecanismo de funcionamento do efeito retroativo e as múltiplas inter-relações entre participantes, processo e produto, Bailey (1996) propõe um modelo básico de efeito retroativo (Figura 1).…”
Section: Souza P R | O Efeito Retroativo Do Eplis Nas Percepções Dunclassified
“…Assim como Bailey (1996), faz uma diferenciação entre efeito retroativo no aluno, relacionado ao o que os alunos aprendem, como eles aprendem, o ritmo, a sequência, o grau e o aprofundamento da aprendizagem, e efeito retroativo no programa, que afeta o conteúdo, a metodologia e a abordagem adotada pelo professor em sala de aula. também apresenta uma metodologia de estudo com o objetivo de compreender a complexidade do efeito retroativo.…”
Section: Souza P R | O Efeito Retroativo Do Eplis Nas Percepções Dunclassified