Working IT Out in Medical Practice: IT Systems Design and Development as Co-Realisation

Abstract

Summary Objectives: The paper explores possibilities for situating IT design and development work within the context of use so as to support the co-realisation of technology and ‘design in use’. The aim is to build a new understanding between IT professionals and users which is grounded upon what happens as the latter grapple with the problems of applying IT, appropriating its functionalities and affordances into their work practices and relations. Methods: Following a discussion of participatory design and ethnomethodology, a novel method called co-realisation, which aims to provide a synthesis of the preceding methods, is suggested as an alternative. Through a discussion of findings from a case study of IT systems design and development in healthcare we show how the co-realisation approach might provide work-affording systems and how user-designer relations might be reformulated. We suggest that work-affording systems can be developed through the deployment of an engaged facilitator who works with the users to unpack the work site-specific potentialities of technology. Results: The case study shows how risk of non-adoption might be minimised through the development of partnerships, and how the presence of the facilitator in the workplace capitalises on the mundane work undertaken therein and how the facilitator might work with the users to develop artefacts that support this work as opposed to reconfiguring it. Conclusions: The case study illustrates co-realisation in action and how it might be seen to reconfigure relations between users and designers in a way that appears productive. Co-realisation can help address the widely observed problem of IT systems failures in healthcare.

Telecare Call Centre Work and Ageing in Place

“…These findings stress the importance of telecare technology providers taking an interest in learning from the experiences of call centre staff (fieldwork extract 16). As one staff member remarked, BYou can't improve something until it goes wrong.^This resonates with findings from Participatory Design, of the importance of 'design-in-use', which emphasises that design does not end after a IT system or service has been implemented (Henderson and Kyng 1992;Procter and Williams 1996;Hartswood et al 2000;Voss et al 2000;Hartswood et al 2002Hartswood et al , 2003bHartswood et al , 2008.…”

Annotation management: a Group decision support system for nurses tasks

“…Our proposal argues that translating this practice into a software design is full of interesting potentialities for the group decision support domain. This allows us to maintain a structuring, organising and constitutive practice, and to build robustness and resilience by the intensive everyday usage of writing tools and the co-creation process that we observed (Hartswood et al, 2003).…”

Rethinking resistance to ‘big IT’: a sociological study of why and when healthcare staff do not use nationally mandated information and communication technologies

“…We anticipate that a codesign or corealisation approach will prove particularly helpful here. 47 Finally, there is the question of the 'generalisablity' of our theory of resistance raised by reviewers of this report. The three cases (three contrasting social practices linked to three very different technologies) all 'fitted' the theory -but this study is preliminary and was not designed or resourced to provide a definitive theoretical framework that has been fully tested across the full range of possibilities.…”

“…'Co-evolution' refers to the parallel and reciprocal evolution of technologies and work roles or routines. 44,47 It might be a largely unintended consequence of introducing a technology (i.e. it is inadvertently found that work roles and practices have to change), or there might be a deliberate plan for such evolution to occur (i.e.…”