2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: Consonance-driven orienting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of WM on unconscious processing cannot be attributed to a bottom-up perceptual priming mechanism, because we failed to observe priming effects when cues were only perceptually identified but not actively held in WM. The present work goes beyond previous studies, which focused on the effects of WM on attentional selection (e.g., Chen & Tsou, 2011;Huang & Pashler, 2007;Olivers, Meijer, & Theeuwes, 2006;Pan, Xu, & Soto, 2009;Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, & Blanco, 2005;Woodman & Luck, 2007) or on conscious awareness (Soto & Humphreys, 2006;Soto et al, 2010). Here, we demonstrate that when a brief masked stimulus among multiple stimuli in the visual field matches the contents of WM, perceptual processing of its unconscious features can be facilitated by WM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The effect of WM on unconscious processing cannot be attributed to a bottom-up perceptual priming mechanism, because we failed to observe priming effects when cues were only perceptually identified but not actively held in WM. The present work goes beyond previous studies, which focused on the effects of WM on attentional selection (e.g., Chen & Tsou, 2011;Huang & Pashler, 2007;Olivers, Meijer, & Theeuwes, 2006;Pan, Xu, & Soto, 2009;Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, & Blanco, 2005;Woodman & Luck, 2007) or on conscious awareness (Soto & Humphreys, 2006;Soto et al, 2010). Here, we demonstrate that when a brief masked stimulus among multiple stimuli in the visual field matches the contents of WM, perceptual processing of its unconscious features can be facilitated by WM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Moreover, several other studies have provided converging evidence showing that WM-driven attention can also influence perceptual processing (e.g., Huang & Pashler, 2007;Pashler & Shiu, 1999;Soto & Humphreys, 2006;Soto, Wriglesworth, Balani, & Humphreys, 2010). For example, a recent study using signal detection analysis by Soto et al (2010) demonstrated that WM-driven attention shifts can enhance visual perception of stimuli matching the contents of WM.…”
Section: Abstract Working Memory Prior Entry Attention Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…matching stimuli in the visual field, even when there is no explicit intention for observers to voluntarily shift attention to those stimuli (e.g., Calleja & Rich, 2013;Carlisle & Woodman, 2011;Downing, 2000;Han, 2015a;Huang & Pashler, 2007;Olivers, Meijer, & Theeuwes, 2006;Pan, 2010;Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, & Blanco, 2005;. This memory-driven attentional capture cannot be attributable to the mechanism of bottom-up priming by stimulus repetition, as mere priming is usually not sufficient to guide attentional deployment (e.g., Olivers et al, 2006;Pan & Soto, 2010;Soto et al, 2005) and distinct neural mechanisms have been found for attentional biases by working memory and repetition priming (Soto, Humphreys, & Rotshtein, 2007;Soto, Llewelyn, & Silvanto, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%