2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory components and intelligence in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
51
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literature and our results we can conclude that WM is related -to a certain degree -to inductive reasoning ability in children (Engel de Abreu, Conway, & Gathercole, 2010;Tillman et al, 2008). This study investigated whether measures for verbal and visuo-spatial WM would explain individual differences in the degree of progression a child demonstrates as a consequence of a short training in figural analogy solving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the literature and our results we can conclude that WM is related -to a certain degree -to inductive reasoning ability in children (Engel de Abreu, Conway, & Gathercole, 2010;Tillman et al, 2008). This study investigated whether measures for verbal and visuo-spatial WM would explain individual differences in the degree of progression a child demonstrates as a consequence of a short training in figural analogy solving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Inductive reasoning ability and working memory capacity are well-established constructs in cognitive ability tests and known to be related (Kail, 2007;Sternberg & Gardner, 1983;Tillman et al, 2008). Performance change and ability to transfer knowledge to novel situations, such as in the reversal task, are less often included in the assessment of intellectual abilities (Bosma & Resing, 2006;Elliott et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is general agreement that representational capacity involves (1) modality-specific components that hold information for a very short period of time, (2) a short-term storage that holds a part of information that is available in modality-specific components for further processing according to a goal, and (3) an executive component that involves processes applied on the information represented in short-term storage for the sake of the goal (Baddeley 1990;Hornung et al 2011;Tillman et al 2008). Wood (2011) showed that there are storage systems for spatiotemporal information related to the movement of objects in space, for object identity information related to the retention of the characteristics of objects, and for snapshot information related to the location of objects.…”
Section: Differentiation Of Thought From Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous findings in children on this issue are unclear: some studies suggest that, when the variance that WM and STM have in common is controlled, only the residual WM factor reveals a significant link with intelligence (Engel De Abreu et al, 2010); other research indicates that the relationship between WM and intelligence is explained primarily by STM (Hornung et al, 2011). In addition, some authors have argued that both storage and executive processes in the WM system can independently predict intelligence (Tillman, Nyberg, & Bohlin, 2008), but well-controlled WM processes have a higher predictive power in typically-developing children than poorly-controlled STM processes (Cornoldi, Giofrè, Calgaro, & Stupiggia, 2013). The inclusion of both verbal and visuospatial STM tasks in our study also gave us an opportunity to test whether the latter are more closely related to intelligence than the former (as suggested by Kane et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%