2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-008-9215-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory Deficits in Boys with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): The Contribution of Central Executive and Subsystem Processes

Abstract: The current study investigated contradictory findings from recent experimental and meta-analytic studies concerning working memory deficits in ADHD. Working memory refers to the cognitive ability to temporarily store and mentally manipulate limited amounts of information for use in guiding behavior. Phonological (verbal) and visuospatial (nonverbal) working memory were assessed across four memory load conditions in 23 boys (12 ADHD, 11 typically developing) using tasks based on Baddeley's (Working memory, thou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

30
289
5
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
30
289
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The control group showed a better performance both in phonological (Bolden, Rapport, Raiker, Sarver, & Kofler, 2012) and visuospatial (Kofler et al, 2010;Martinussen et al, 2005;Rapport et al, 2008;Willcutt et al, 2005) working memory than ADHD subgroups Kasper et al, 2012;Schoechlin & Engel, 2005;Schweitzer, Hanford, & Medoff, 2006). However, the difference in phonological WM was limited to Letters and Numbers task, while the performance in Inverse Digits task was similar between ADHD and control groups (Holmes et al, 2014;Rosenthal, Riccio, Gsanger, & Jarratt, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The control group showed a better performance both in phonological (Bolden, Rapport, Raiker, Sarver, & Kofler, 2012) and visuospatial (Kofler et al, 2010;Martinussen et al, 2005;Rapport et al, 2008;Willcutt et al, 2005) working memory than ADHD subgroups Kasper et al, 2012;Schoechlin & Engel, 2005;Schweitzer, Hanford, & Medoff, 2006). However, the difference in phonological WM was limited to Letters and Numbers task, while the performance in Inverse Digits task was similar between ADHD and control groups (Holmes et al, 2014;Rosenthal, Riccio, Gsanger, & Jarratt, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Tillman, Eninger, Forssman, and Bohlin (2011), found a proportionally inverse relationship between the performance in phonological and visuospatial WM tasks and the levels of inattention, as well as a significant relationship between hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms and the phonological WM performance, not in the visuospatial component. These results suggest the implication of different processes of the components that form the WM given the dimensions of ADHD (Tillman et al, 2011), for example, the symptoms of hyperactivity (Rapport et al, 2008), impulsivity or inattention (Burgess et al, 2010;Holmes et al, 2010;Kane et al, 2007), as well as a greater connection between the central executive dysfunction and inattention (Willcutt et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Barkley, 1997;Quay, 1997), state regulation (Sergeant, 2000), motivational processes (Sonuga-Barke, 2002), or working memory (Rapport et al, 2008). Many of the ERP studies reviewed here do not specifically address or compare these theoretical perspectives, but there are some exceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%